At what speeds does TT bike matter

I am seeking opinions on advantages of TT bikes vs road bike with clip on bars at modest speeds.
A bit of background...
Up until 2013 I spent a few years doing TT's on a road bike with clip on bars eventually getting down to a short 23 min 10 on that setup. Nothing special but I was quite happy with this. Couldn't afford loads of aero gear and TT bike to go lots faster and sought new challenges away from TT'ing.
Fast forward to today and apologies but, I have been doing triathlons amongst other things and am now in the fortunate position of owning a TT bike.
I live right in the middle of the Ironman UK course and regularly ride parts of it on both the road bike (with clip ons) and TT bike. It is a reasonably undulating route and not on particularly fast roads. Typically I average about 16-17 mph riding at top of Z2 Heart rate. However, whichever bike I ride, the speeds are almost identical.
Now, I am firmly of the opinion that I am simply not going fast enough to benefit from the aero advantages of the TT bike. I am keen to hear if people think this makes sense or not. Whenever I discuss this with triathletes, they always insist my bike must fit badly because a TT bike is always quicker. I take triathlete opinions with huge pinches of salt as they are obsessed with buying speed beyond reason in many cases. However, I am keen to hear if cyclists think a TT bike should be making me quicker at speeds around 16-17 mph. I either need to hear I'm right that a TT bike won't make much difference or someone to say it really should and I should investigate why it isn't doing.
I do have a reasonably aero setup on both bikes with seat to handlebar drop around 12-15cm on road and similar (to pads) on TT bike so I'm not a sit up and beg triathlete.
I keep looking at my TT bike wondering if I've invested money for no reason or should be getting more from it.
A bit of background...
Up until 2013 I spent a few years doing TT's on a road bike with clip on bars eventually getting down to a short 23 min 10 on that setup. Nothing special but I was quite happy with this. Couldn't afford loads of aero gear and TT bike to go lots faster and sought new challenges away from TT'ing.
Fast forward to today and apologies but, I have been doing triathlons amongst other things and am now in the fortunate position of owning a TT bike.
I live right in the middle of the Ironman UK course and regularly ride parts of it on both the road bike (with clip ons) and TT bike. It is a reasonably undulating route and not on particularly fast roads. Typically I average about 16-17 mph riding at top of Z2 Heart rate. However, whichever bike I ride, the speeds are almost identical.
Now, I am firmly of the opinion that I am simply not going fast enough to benefit from the aero advantages of the TT bike. I am keen to hear if people think this makes sense or not. Whenever I discuss this with triathletes, they always insist my bike must fit badly because a TT bike is always quicker. I take triathlete opinions with huge pinches of salt as they are obsessed with buying speed beyond reason in many cases. However, I am keen to hear if cyclists think a TT bike should be making me quicker at speeds around 16-17 mph. I either need to hear I'm right that a TT bike won't make much difference or someone to say it really should and I should investigate why it isn't doing.
I do have a reasonably aero setup on both bikes with seat to handlebar drop around 12-15cm on road and similar (to pads) on TT bike so I'm not a sit up and beg triathlete.
I keep looking at my TT bike wondering if I've invested money for no reason or should be getting more from it.
0
Posts
Ok I'd expect the TT bike to be slightly faster so Maybe it is to do with your position ? You could be too low and reducing your power output.
Post some side on photos of you on each bike maybe ?
Yes, it is road with tri bars. Will have a nosey for photo's. There are a few of me on TT bike knocking about but don't think there are many of me on the road bike with tri-bars.
IMUK is a lot more lumpy so you might well be climbing faster on the road bike and that's masking the differences ?
Looking at your position as well, I don't think it's that good. Unless it's a photo taken at a particularly badtime, any aero gain you're making will be offset by the fact your head looks like someone has plonked a melon on top of your shoulders and angled it upwards :lol If you struggle with getting your back flatter (and it looks like you might, from the curve there), try dropping your head a bit more. Nothing wrong with a curved back, but the air hitting your head is going to cause a huge amount of drag if you don't try and make it flatter across your shoulders.
Specialising in Git Daaahns and Cafs. Norvern Munkey/Transplanted Laaandoner.
This is the conclusion I have been leaning towards but everybody keeps telling me I'm wrong so I'm widening the net of opinions. Not very scientific I know.
I was a couple of mins slower on the TT bike yesterday on a repeated ride vs road bike but it was windier. Seems to be I was quicker in certain sections and slower in others and they're cancelling each other out.
Now this is harsh
I'm certain the gains will become apparent at higher speeds, just not seeing them at the slower pace I expect to do in an IM. Maybe time to do some different timed efforts on fast flat courses to establish the differences.
if you rode your road bike in more TTs it would come down if you can do an 18. you must have the power. my road bike pb is a very short 22 and Id never do a 19 though i only tried for a season and never on fast courses, i just CBA with TT.
Also ive reached that age where im only going to start going slower
Positions are weird. You might make aero gains, for example, by flattening out your back and dropping your head (longer stem, higher saddle for instance) but any gain you make there may be offset by an accompanying loss of power. I'm by no means an extreme example here, and my FTP on a road bike is 316, on a TT bike its 283 - and that's after numerous position changes, a fantastic TT bike fit that added almost 30 watts from what it used to be and making no other aero changes (same wheels, same sh*tty skinsuit, no slippery socks or anything else)
I do crits and road races too, so don't really pay much attention to TTs. As I get older, I'll inevitably have to accept that a fat chopper who only took up racing at 42 isn't likely to get anything above second cat and concentrate more on TTs in the future - so will be paying it a bit more attention in a couple of years
I'd suggest experimenting. Get out somewhere with a reasonably quiet DC (Rainford Bypass - the A570 between the M58 and the East Lancs Rd is your best bet if you're on the IMUK route) and baseline a three minute effort at 90%. Then make some incremental changes to saddle height & set-back, stack height, simulate stem length changes by changing pad position etc. Repeat each time you make a change. I would have thought a couple of hours testing should allow you to at least make some aero gains, and get you on the right track for where you should concentrate future changes
Specialising in Git Daaahns and Cafs. Norvern Munkey/Transplanted Laaandoner.
Anyway I agree with the OPs mates that a TT rig should be faster than a road bike with clip ons on just about any course. When I did have a go at TTs a few years back first time out on a TT bike I took a minute off my best in our sporting 12.5 mile course and it was faster on our hilly course too. One of the club who was a good TTer avoided using his TT bike on the hilly because it was single front ring and he was a big lump, when he did use it one week he set a pb.