England were actually dier. If they’d had a hard group, they wouldn’t have made it out. Same old England, different day.
That is very harsh, England did as expected against who they played, no more no less. They made the most of a favourable draw and some "bigger" teams going out early.
Which teams at a similar level to England did better?
England were actually dier. If they’d had a hard group, they wouldn’t have made it out. Same old England, different day.
That is very harsh, England did as expected against who they played, no more no less. They made the most of a favourable draw and some "bigger" teams going out early.
Which teams at a similar level to England did better?
Belgium. They belted us twice.
No, Belgium have two world class midfielders, we haven't.
England were actually dier. If they’d had a hard group, they wouldn’t have made it out. Same old England, different day.
That is very harsh, England did as expected against who they played, no more no less. They made the most of a favourable draw and some "bigger" teams going out early.
Which teams at a similar level to England did better?
England were actually dier. If they’d had a hard group, they wouldn’t have made it out. Same old England, different day.
That is very harsh, England did as expected against who they played, no more no less. They made the most of a favourable draw and some "bigger" teams going out early.
Which teams at a similar level to England did better?
Belgium. They belted us twice.
Good to see that your ability to always be wrong transcends sports.
England were actually dier. If they’d had a hard group, they wouldn’t have made it out. Same old England, different day.
That is very harsh, England did as expected against who they played, no more no less. They made the most of a favourable draw and some "bigger" teams going out early.
Which teams at a similar level to England did better?
Belgium. They belted us twice.
Good to see that your ability to always be wrong transcends sports.
Have you been triple counting Belgium’s goals?
.
You’re a knob. 2-0 is a belting, what sort of clueless knob are you?
England were actually dier. If they’d had a hard group, they wouldn’t have made it out. Same old England, different day.
That is very harsh, England did as expected against who they played, no more no less. They made the most of a favourable draw and some "bigger" teams going out early.
Which teams at a similar level to England did better?
Belgium. They belted us twice.
Good to see that your ability to always be wrong transcends sports.
Have you been triple counting Belgium’s goals?
.
You’re a knob. 2-0 is a belting, what sort of clueless knob are you?
Your ability to write English suggests a reasonable level of intelligence so you either deliberately write the opposite of what is correct or you have a mental illness.
Either way it is something of a relief to be considered a clueless knob.
Find me one other person in the world who considers 1-0 to be a belting
Find me one other person in the world who considers 1-0 to be a belting
I would say that the first game counts. The Belgian manager said the first objective was to not win the the game for the easier draw. They couldn't manage to lose while trying.
The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
Find me one other person in the world who considers 1-0 to be a belting
I would say that the first game counts. The Belgian manager said the first objective was to not win the the game for the easier draw. They couldn't manage to lose while trying.
If he really wanted to lose he'd have started Mignolet
Believe that a farther shore
Is reachable from here.
Believe in miracles
And cures and healing wells
Good to see that your ability to always be wrong transcends sports.
Do you mind not splitting your infinitives like that? Please. It lets us down in front of our Russian friend.
Bizarrely that is the only thing about English that I know because of Capt James T. Kirk unforgivable “boldly going”
Split infinitives have been around since at least the 13th century. Daniel Defoe, Benjamin Franklin, William Wordsworth, Abraham Lincoln, George Eliot, Henry James, and Willa Cather are among the writers who used them. Keep on splitting, I say.
1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
Pinnacle Monzonite
Liberal metropolitan, remoaner, traitor, "sympathiser", etc.
Posts
Our Waterloo
True.
It seems that way.
Good to see that your ability to always be wrong transcends sports.
Have you been triple counting Belgium’s goals?
You’re a knob. 2-0 is a belting, what sort of clueless knob are you?
Your ability to write English suggests a reasonable level of intelligence so you either deliberately write the opposite of what is correct or you have a mental illness.
Either way it is something of a relief to be considered a clueless knob.
Find me one other person in the world who considers 1-0 to be a belting
I am not sure. You have no chance.
Do you mind not splitting your infinitives like that? Please. It lets us down in front of our Russian friend.
If he really wanted to lose he'd have started Mignolet
Is reachable from here.
Believe in miracles
And cures and healing wells
Bizarrely that is the only thing about English that I know because of Capt James T. Kirk unforgivable “boldly going”
Split infinitives have been around since at least the 13th century. Daniel Defoe, Benjamin Franklin, William Wordsworth, Abraham Lincoln, George Eliot, Henry James, and Willa Cather are among the writers who used them. Keep on splitting, I say.
Pinnacle Monzonite
Liberal metropolitan, remoaner, traitor, "sympathiser", etc.
Aww leave him alone. He’s obviously a bit ‘special’. It’s wicked to mock the afflicted.
Bruiser
Panzer
Commuter
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]
Careful Walt, you may stray off the reservation