Bare trusts - confirmation Q

orraloon
orraloon Posts: 12,608
edited March 2017 in The cake stop
Grateful for any experience of using a bare trust to protect monies for the benefit of minors and prevent any possibility of soon to be divorced parent getting mitts on.

In brief, stepdaughter has very young twins, is now a single mother having been abandoned by the adulterous, drug abusing, soon to be divorced father, who it turns out was sh4gging away before, during and after their birth. Scum bag.

We want to secure monies away for the young 'uns, but keep it safe from any attempt by the scumbag to gain access to stick up his nose.

Research would indicate a simple bare trust arrangement, twins as beneficiaries, us as trustees, would work. Trustees control what happens with funds in trust until minors turn 18, but funds belong to them, scumbag parent has no right of access.

Anybody see any problems with this? Other than two 18y.o.s blowing it all on a mega party in 17 and a bit years time.

Comments

  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 25,586
    Not sure on the legal aspects, but I'd consider a higher level of maturity. Both of the trust and children.
    I have a few younger family members and I'd only trust one of them with a large amount of cash at 18.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • mrfpb
    mrfpb Posts: 4,569
    If the trustees are trustworthy (!) then a discretionary trust could be better, ie the trustees manage and dispose of the monies/estate on behalf of the beneficiaries at the total discretion of the trustees. For this type of trust the beneficiaries have no control of the money, and it cannot be counted as an asset they own. The person setting up the trust can write a letter outlining their wishes to the trustees. I would certainly advise your step daughter to get advice from an accredited wills and trust advisor - (not necessarily a solicitor, but an expert in this area).
  • mamba80
    mamba80 Posts: 5,032
    whose cash assets are these?

    your daughter cant go disposing of cash or anything else just before a divorce and if they are your assets, then how can this guy make a claim against you?

    Totally agree on getting advice re any trust fund you might choose to set up.
  • capt_slog
    capt_slog Posts: 3,939
    Convert all the money to 50p pieces. It's a lot harder to get these up your nose, or am I missing something?








    Sorry I can't really help, but flippancy aside, I sympathise with your plight and hope you get things sorted out.


    The older I get, the better I was.

  • FishFish
    FishFish Posts: 2,152
    mrfpb has identified one of the issues which is that the money is transferred then it is a gift and is most likely subject to tax. The other issue is that hiding it from the ex - who well may have a legal claim on the money even if no moral right to it can get it back. Get a trust adviser involved and think about age 25.

    If the wife wants to hide the money then hide it in an investment after putting it through a couple of accounts. The courts do have the power of discovery and if her ex wants to get the money then could invoke this. However they never look in to investment funds - they stop at bank accounts.
    ...take your pickelf on your holibobs.... :D

    jeez :roll:
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 40,210
    My reading of this is that the OP wants to put their money into the trust fund not their step daughter. I assume the concern is that the (soon to be) ex-husband as a legal guardian may have access to the funds or pressure the children into passing some on in later life.
  • mamba80
    mamba80 Posts: 5,032
    Pross wrote:
    My reading of this is that the OP wants to put their money into the trust fund not their step daughter. I assume the concern is that the (soon to be) ex-husband as a legal guardian may have access to the funds or pressure the children into passing some on in later life.

    this is what i dont understand..... why bother? the OP needs to come back and clarify.

    the ex has no claim on the in-laws wealth and the OP can make provision in their Will for the kids, if they see fit.

    if he is a drug using waster as portrayed, its likely he ll be very dead soon.
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,921
    Another thing to consider is what happens if something, God forbid, happens to the kids.
    Would any wealth they hold pass to their parents in the event of their demise?
  • mamba80
    mamba80 Posts: 5,032
    Ballysmate wrote:
    Another thing to consider is what happens if something, God forbid, happens to the kids.
    Would any wealth they hold pass to their parents in the event of their demise?

    ...and you an Stevo say i'm gloomy.
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 12,608
    Thanks for input so far. Hadn't thought of the 50p option :D

    Clarifications. Not the mother trying to hide family assets ahead of divorce settlement; there is little in that pot. This is us seniors gifting a lump sum and smallish chunks on birthdays and holidays etc; invested in dividend bearing stocks with divi reinvestment plus the wonders of compounding over many years could provide a nice wee sum in the future.

    She's going through the sh!tstorm, him being a bellend means has to go to court to get a financial order for spousal maintenance to ensure that said bellend makes some financial provision for the future of his children. In that, all 'family' assets have to be declared and apportioned. Will be a long drawn out and stressful process for her.

    From our side, alongside the long term objectives have the short term concern, to keep our contributions out of the reach of bellend; so far all we have done is earmarked our money for them, kept it to ourselves, not gifted into the 'family' so that cannot be counted as part of the assets pot to be split. Could carry on with that. But would stay in our estate, and could get messy to sort out if we get hit by the bus. Also want the mother to have reassurance / psychological support that there is this pot earmarked for her children, in a safe place.

    Hence, the trust arrangement scenario. The simple bare trust seems like would give us the protection from a future attempted grab by scumbag. Do have the concern about what happens when minors turn 18, partic if a druggie manipulative father were by some miracle to survive that long.

    So, discretionary trust with reliable trustees might be the way. Not talking huge sums here, so little wary of getting 'professionals' involved at £6 per minute.

    (What a subject to be internetting about while on hols in southern hemisphere sun! Must be worrying me)
  • rjsterry
    rjsterry Posts: 27,483
    orraloon wrote:
    ... Not talking huge sums here, so little wary of getting 'professionals' involved at £6 per minute...

    On the other hand, you wouldn't have a go at DIY dentistry after watching YouTube. A couple of hundred quid worth of advice is still a pretty modest investment, and less than the cost of ****ing it up.
    1985 Mercian King of Mercia - work in progress (Hah! Who am I kidding?)
    Pinnacle Monzonite

    Part of the anti-growth coalition
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,921
    rjsterry wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    ... Not talking huge sums here, so little wary of getting 'professionals' involved at £6 per minute...

    On the other hand, you wouldn't have a go at DIY dentistry after watching YouTube. A couple of hundred quid worth of advice is still a pretty modest investment, and less than the cost of ****ing it up.

    No, I wouldn't like to risk my grandkids future on the word of some bloke on t'internet either.
  • mamba80
    mamba80 Posts: 5,032
    Ballysmate wrote:
    rjsterry wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    ... Not talking huge sums here, so little wary of getting 'professionals' involved at £6 per minute...

    On the other hand, you wouldn't have a go at DIY dentistry after watching YouTube. A couple of hundred quid worth of advice is still a pretty modest investment, and less than the cost of ****ing it up.

    No, I wouldn't like to risk my grandkids future on the word of some bloke on t'internet either.

    there is alot to consider here, not least, him being next of kin and/or your kids becoming wasters and still legally entitled to the funds in the trust.

    you should be able to get free legal advice through your household insurance or an employer scheme and as said, paying to get it right is a cheap option.... assuming who you use now what they are doing, this isnt a given at all.
  • mamba80 wrote:
    Ballysmate wrote:
    rjsterry wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    ... Not talking huge sums here, so little wary of getting 'professionals' involved at £6 per minute...

    On the other hand, you wouldn't have a go at DIY dentistry after watching YouTube. A couple of hundred quid worth of advice is still a pretty modest investment, and less than the cost of ****ing it up.

    No, I wouldn't like to risk my grandkids future on the word of some bloke on t'internet either.

    there is alot to consider here, not least, him being next of kin and/or your kids becoming wasters and still legally entitled to the funds in the trust.

    you should be able to get free legal advice through your household insurance or an employer scheme and as said, paying to get it right is a cheap option.... assuming who you use now what they are doing, this isnt a given at all.

    change your will ASAP (or write one) as if you (and the missus) meet the proverbial bus it will go to her and potentially on to him. Get her to change (write) her will leaving money to the kids with you as trustees.

    For me most of your other issues and solutions will depend upon the sums involved as any benefits could be eaten up by fees. If there is more hundreds of thousands then inheritance tax and it's avoidance becomes an issue
  • mrfpb
    mrfpb Posts: 4,569
    These organisations will point you to a competent advisor. Most will writers cover trusts. As I said before, it doesn't have to be a solicitor, it can be a lot cheaper and accreditation makes it safer.

    http://www.willwriters.com/

    http://www.ipw.org.uk/

    However it is an unregulated activity, so it's worth asking around for recommendations.
  • giropaul
    giropaul Posts: 414
    My advice, based on my and friends experiences, is to talk to a good, established solicitor. What mine ( old established practice, handled my parents' estates) told me was that, unless we are talking millions here, a fancy trust arrangement has the potential to eat itself years after the people who set it up are gone - like the Dickens Jarndice v Jarndice.
    A will with simple what ifs built in, I.e. If a and b predecessor d then the legacy is held in a simple way until d reaches age x.
    AND he charged me less than a quarter what my friend was charged by a will writer AND his firm will handle the probate as and when.
    That's my personal advice BUT I'M NOT A SOLICITOR. So to be honest it's worth nothing. For the price of a good pair of wheels see a good solicitor:-)
  • florerider
    florerider Posts: 1,112
    You probably need advice on bare vs discrectionary, and think about what the money is to be used for, and if any state benefits would be adversely affected by a bare trust, including yours.

    In my experience advice is expensive, but this is a case where getting it wrong can lead to the money leaking to the wrong parties.