Garmin vs Sky (non-doping related)
Comments
-
RichN95 wrote:The Truth wrote:Froome just put two DpVAM bars solidly up
on AX3 going
4.5% faster than the 2008-2013 GT baseline
and
1.9% faster than the 2002-2007 dopers
(based on the Scott Richards regressions
http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/what- ... is-froome/)
http://www.outsideonline.com/fitness/bi ... mance.html0 -
Why did you label this thread (None doping related) when all you wanted to do was talk about Sky and your obsession with claiming they are doping? And as there was not a Sky doping thread running currently, you thought you would invent one. :roll:0
-
Can we just change the title of this thread to " Are sky doping? " and resume normal business.
I blame Leinders . Froome has been just to good,
The Mt Ventoux for instance, if you think that's a clean ride you must have sh%t in your eyes.
Telling it like I see it.0 -
You've all got a month of this hogwash to look forward too.
He's been turfed out of his regular home.............for trolling!"Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.0 -
Hautacam is going to be very interesting this year at Le Tour.0
-
unfortunatly how anyone sees it bears no relation to reality
Witness how Messers Wenger or Mourinio see a challenge in the penalty box completely differently depending on whether or not it was their player that was tackled/tacklingWe're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
mike6 wrote:Why did you label this thread (None doping related) when all you wanted to do was talk about Sky and your obsession with claiming they are doping? And as there was not a Sky doping thread running currently, you thought you would invent one. :roll:0
-
Blazing Saddles wrote:You've all got a month of this hogwash to look forward too.
He's been turfed out of his regular home.............for trolling!Twitter: @RichN950 -
The Truth wrote:RichN95 wrote:The Truth wrote:Froome just put two DpVAM bars solidly up
on AX3 going
4.5% faster than the 2008-2013 GT baseline
and
1.9% faster than the 2002-2007 dopers
(based on the Scott Richards regressions
http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/what- ... is-froome/)
http://www.outsideonline.com/fitness/bi ... mance.html
Bloody hell, compared to what you write on here, that's really well written (if very debatable). That is your own words, isn't it?It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
rayjay wrote:Can we just change the title of this thread to " Are sky doping? " and resume normal business.
I blame Leinders . Froome has been just to good,
The Mt Ventoux for instance, if you think that's a clean ride you must have sh%t in your eyes.
Telling it like I see it.
If you disagree with me, you're wrong. Good argument."In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"
@gietvangent0 -
The Truth wrote:mike6 wrote:Why did you label this thread (None doping related) when all you wanted to do was talk about Sky and your obsession with claiming they are doping? And as there was not a Sky doping thread running currently, you thought you would invent one. :roll:
Come on. No amount of explaining will ever be good enough. I don't even know why you're pretending to be objective.It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
Salsiccia1 wrote:The Truth wrote:RichN95 wrote:The Truth wrote:Froome just put two DpVAM bars solidly up
on AX3 going
4.5% faster than the 2008-2013 GT baseline
and
1.9% faster than the 2002-2007 dopers
(based on the Scott Richards regressions
http://www.cyclismas.com/biscuits/what- ... is-froome/)
http://www.outsideonline.com/fitness/bi ... mance.html
Bloody hell, compared to what you write on here, that's really well written (if very debatable). That is your own words, isn't it?
Even if at the end it handily points out that this theory hasn't been validated in any way shape or form and all it really tells us is that Chris Froome was much faster than all the people he beat."In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"
@gietvangent0 -
The Truth wrote:mike6 wrote:Why did you label this thread (None doping related) when all you wanted to do was talk about Sky and your obsession with claiming they are doping? And as there was not a Sky doping thread running currently, you thought you would invent one. :roll:
Rather than asking people on this forum, go and read Moneyball by Michael Lewis and The Sports Gene by David Epstein. Then you might understand a little about sport.Twitter: @RichN950 -
The Truth wrote:MartinGT wrote:Hautacam is going to be very interesting this year at Le Tour.
What do you mean? Riis didn't even know about warming down or power meters. Clean riders should be able to beat his time.
No they won't. But those drugged up bastards at Sky will beat his time. Riding backwards on the big ring with their mouths closed.It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
I think the FACT that Froomes times up some of the tours cols, puts him quicker than a whole bunch of dopers is quite telling.
IMO0 -
rayjay wrote:I think the FACT that Froomes times up some of the tours cols, puts him quicker than a whole bunch of dopers is quite telling.
IMO
Absolutely. He's obviously off his tits.It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
5 pages in 3 hours. Do any of you work.
Once again the doping threads are so much more popular than the pro racing threads.Contador is the Greatest0 -
frenchfighter wrote:5 pages in 3 hours. Do any of you work.
Once again the doping threads are so much more popular than the pro racing threads.
That's because there's only some much you can say about the desert races, and people are sick of the same old bollocks being trotted out with so little evidence other than a pre-set agenda.It's only a bit of sport, Mun. Relax and enjoy the racing.0 -
In fairness FF - most of us are flat out takng the p1ss adn it's 5 o clock so meh...
(plus we had ones of those Staff birthday awkwardfest things that just blew any chance of me doing anything worthwile out of the water)We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
FFS guys just leave the troll alone and the thread will die. The last PoS doping thread has finally been closed so a new one is being created, all that's going to happen is the same old circular arguments and this site spiralling even further down the s*itter.0
-
Listen to the cows people:
Correlation is not causation.0 -
Pross wrote:FFS guys just leave the troll alone and the thread will die. The last PoS doping thread has finally been closed so a new one is being created, all that's going to happen is the same old circular arguments and this site spiralling even further down the s*itter.
You sound angry. I just wanted to make a comparison between the two cleanest teams in the peloton.
No one has presented any evidence that shows how sky can be so much better.0 -
-
Well they have - its just that you're ignoring them.0
This discussion has been closed.