Bike life expectancy - how long does yours last

Six years out of a commuter frame in London is pretty good going.

I have had frames that last longer and frames that have not lasted anywhere near that long.

IMHO, if you like the frame keep it and replace all the worn things, inc headset, gear levers, brakes etc. This may prove a bit more expensive than a new bike but you could pace it out a bit to spread the cost; and you would hold on to the frame you like.

As you are aware, many bikes are made down to a price, also some newer technologies, IMHO, are not as good as what they are meant to replace.

Surely there's nothing on a bike that's not replaceable meaning that it can go one forever unless the frame is cracked or something. You can replace wheels, bearings in the wheels, spokes etc, you can replace cassettes and chainrings and chains, cables, even mechs are serviceable. Bikes have relatively few parts and unlike cars or motorbikes can be pretty easily brought back to excellent riding condition again... If you replace everything that's worn and give it a good clean it could be as good as new. I suppose there's a point at which you've replaced everything on the bike and the frame is the only original component and it may as well be a new bike! Question is whether you want to spend the money on the old bike or whether you'd prefer just to spunk everything on a new shiny model!

Very personal choice, if the frame is well looked after, I'd be inclined to keep adding parts as required, most people don't do 4+k miles a year so getting nearly new used parts would be a cheaper way of doing it. But if you want a new bike, then clearly it's justified.

Talius wrote:

How long do you reckon your bike should last?

My Scott Speedster is now 6 years old, and has done probably about 25000 miles. And it's dying. It's had work done, and I've looked after it as much as anyone can be bothered to look after a £1000 commuter stalwart, but I guess it's a long way from being like Trigger's broom. It's had new wheels, brake pads, cables etc, but essentially the frame (aluminium), drivetrain (part ultegra), and key bits are all as bought. It's not that its now got any major issues, it's still perfectly usable for my commute. But it just seems a bit like a very old dog, where it wants to run around and bark and chase things, but nothing really works as well as it used to, and it's all a bit patchy and geriatric.

I know I need to get a new one, and I will do, but I will miss this bike. Just wondering whether people think it's done a good service, or whether I should patch it up and keep on with it?

Cheers!

What exactly is wrong with it? Keep in mind Ribble are going a full 105 groupset for £299 which would make your bike feel like new! - But you probably don't even need all that.

ddraver wrote:

You could replace almost everything on the frame if you re particularly smitten by it but there comes a point where it's cheaper to ride it into the ground, buy a new one and give the old one an honourable burial.

This isn't really true IMO. The only way this can happen is by poor maintenance as you end up with needing to replace lots of things at the same time. You don't have electrical systems that deteriorate and are irrepairable without complete replacement. Or corrosion that continually needs to be repaired year after year. If something breaks or wears out on a bike, you replace it with a new part and it is as good as new again. On my Ribble I have replaced cables, brake blocks, tyres, BB bearings, wheel bearings, hub bearings, cassettes, chains and the chainrings. Each component is replaced when required (or rather a while after required because I am a bit disorganised!) and the most expensive of these parts has been the big chainring but that was only about £35 off Ebay.

At some point, I'll need the shifters servicing which I think is about £30 each. Then the front wheel is nearly worn out but that should be about £60 at the most to replace.

None of my bills have been more expensive than a new bike - or infact anywhere near. The 'run it into the ground' argument may work with cars but certainly doesn't with bikes - providing you fix/replace things when they need it. But if you don't fix things when they need it, there is no point buying a new bike either as it will just deteriorate rapidly to the same state the old bike was in!

To be honest, I expect my tourer to out last me.

Rolf F wrote:

ddraver wrote:

Stuff.

More Stuff

Ok well lend Talius your time machine and he can go back and maintain what he didnt 6 years ago...

I ve been around here long enough to know that youre more than happy to argue for the sake of arguing Rolf.

Talius has our views - he can decide how to balance time spent fettling/cleaning/repairing vs money saved over having a bike that he has to do nothing on and doesnt mind trashing. Both options are equally valid...

Cost of replacing everything at once that wouldn't reasonably be expected to last forever (based on my commuting bike):
Chain £15
Cassette £25
Chainrings £50
Wheel bearings £20
Rims £70
Bottom bracket £15
Headset bearings £10
Jockey wheels £10
Cables £30
Brake blocks £5
Cable guide under bottom bracket £3 (I've just killed one)
Tyres £40

That's less than £300; the figure for many bikes would be cheaper than this (eg cheaper rims/tyres/cassette), and you'd have to be using some pretty flash kit to come in dramatically higher. This includes a lot of items like rims and chainrings which should typically last several years, and assumes you replace *everything* at once. Replace stuff when it needs replacing, and you get the new bike experience all the time, rather than spending most of your time riding a sh*tter while you wait for enough components to die to justify the replacement.

I really can't understand why people don't maintain their bikes properly, it must make them horrible to ride...

If you are anal about maintenance and don't buy aluminium frames, a bike can last for many decades. If you ride in the wet a lot and don't keep up the maintenance, a bike can last very little.
This bike is 33 years old, but it has seen the rain on a couple of occasions and it receives lots of attention


This will clearly not last that long...

I think everyone's missing the point:

OP, is your current bike a road bike or the hybrid version? If the latter, they of course you need a new bike.

Other than that, I'll say that I personally have cracked two different frames: one steel, one aluminium in the past two years. I keep my bike clean and well maintained, but I ride them really too damn fast on really badly maintained roads. Ho hum. So far, when I've broken a frame, I've managed an upgrade to replace it.

will3 wrote:

You must have as low an impression of my intellect as I now have of yours as a result of you posting the above!

ddraver wrote:

What about replaing like with like - lets say 105 with 105

Ultegra/105 brakes pads = £10 an end so £20 - putting me 400% over TGOTB's price

105 cassette = £40, not 25

Rims and bearings fine but most of us are also talking about a shop to rebuild the wheel too so lets add another £50 at least on to that (and I think we ll know that in London that would be exceptionally generous)...

Plus time spent, plus LBS service time etc etc

These are fair points - diy maintenance does make a difference (to all of these costs) but you'd hope that most people who can manage to get 25000 miles out of a bike will be able to do most things themselves. But who needs to put a £40 cassette on a commuter? I recently bought two spare Veloce cassttes for my Ribble - special offer from Halfords - £16 each. Swissstop pads same price for a set of four. Bought some Tacx Jockey wheels from Ribble - about £6.50 irrc.

Wheel rebuild - £60-£70 will buy a whole wheel. I daresay Ugo will tell us what he'd charge if you bunged him your nice hub in the post and asked him to turn it into a Taste the Value complete commuting wheel.