Depression and Doping

RichN95 wrote:

And written by one of the most high profile purveyors of unsubstantiated gossip on twitter. The hypocracy of some people is staggering.

F8&king unbelievable

EDIT: I've just wigged out on the Twatter about it

Yellow Peril wrote:

EDIT: I'm not on twitter, should I sign up?

If you're not on it by now then you're probably not missing much.

It's like a very long Festinagirl tweet, really. Lots of conjecture, backed by a fairly thin "well it seems to make sense" rationale. Is cycling any different from any other elite sport? Plenty of footballers have gone on to drug abuse, addiction, alcoholism and suicide, for instance. And plenty of people that drive buses, do accounts, serve in shops etc. have done the same.

A few factual innacuracies as well: what, exactly, is the bigger and better thing that Obree has gone on to after his depression? I'm glad he's dealt with it, I like him a lot (see my signature), but professionally I don't think he's topped beating the hour record twice. "Forfra" only means "from the front" literally - in Danish it means "start again" or "take it from the top". Blunt statement of who has produced the highest power ever (Contador, apparently, Riis second) - based on....? Oh, that'll be Vayer I imagine.

Despite the good and bad elements to the article, there clearly is an issue.

Question is whether cycling causes depression or whether depressed people are attracted to cycling.

Truth is probably a bit of both.

Oh the irony - the comments about Santa and his suicide tweet and the cruel responses on Twitter and forums - from someone who was happy to muck rake and make all kinds of accusations on twitter, wonder if she gave Wiggins' demons any thought as she laid into his transformation from track to yellow jersey.

Forgetting who wrote it for a minute, which is hard with the snide comments about marginal gains etc

The annoying thing about an article like this is that it is a pure opinion piece that could have been better researched and linked to actual evidence. I am not saying her assertions are wrong but within the first few paragraphs she asserts that there is strong evidence that there is a link between forms of doping and depression, but doesn't reference anything. Later she links us to a study by Patten, which in its conclusion says that the study doesn't show causal influence.

Yellow Peril wrote:

EDIT: I'm not on twitter, should I sign up?

Only if you want to look at pictures of cats.

Joelsim wrote:

I think that article says it all really.
Chapeau.

It really doesn't. It's repugnant bullsh1t. It seeks to draw a direct correlation between doping and depression. If the former leads to the latter, then maybe we can assume the the latter is an indication of the former.

It stigmatises depression as a symptom of doping, rather than an affliction suffered by many.

The writer is someone with a track record of doping gossip mongering and now, with this article, she has invited us to compare riders who admit depression with know dopers such as Pantani and Vandenbrocke. The resulting nudges and winks from the self-appointed guardians of the sport may discourage those that need help from asking for it.

They say that exercising outside gives almost the same benefit as using a drug like Prozac so people who are a more depressive type may use this type of exercise as a subconscious aid to their problems. If they are good at the Sport they may progress to the top. I am rubbish when I'm not riding.
I take a steroid nasal spray and inhaler and have problems with sores around my mouth and the Doc says it could easily be a side effect of using steroids. The junk that Pro Cyclists use and have used must have some serious side effects and I have wondered how these riders function as I get all sorts of side effects from different Prescription drugs. Inhalers also gives me the shakes for starters.
Also being well known and the adulation of fans, to then go to a non de script, anonymous retirement must bring it's problems. It's tricky if that ending comes from being banned and thrown out in disgrace. I guess a retired ex doper may feel as though they were playing the game by doping and why should they be made a scapegoat for the sport.
I knew someone who was a small time pro in France and he hated it. The Manager was like a dictator and he was constantly on the limit and always told he was too fat. One instance, this guy was in a break in a race where the sponsor had turned up. The break was caught and this rider was dropped by the main peleton and the Manager berated this guy for getting dropped in front of the Sponsor.

Being a bike rider isn't all glamour for sure and it's a hard life.

Above The Cows wrote:

RichN95 wrote:

The thing with writing about depression is that unless you are a mental health profession or writing for experience then you would be well advised to steer clear of the subject. There's enough misinformation on the subject as it is without adding half-baked theories and 100 year old stories to the pile.

^This x1000

and another x1000

Some of the reactions here are as unhinged as dispatches from die-hard doperati. Viewing everything someone does through the narrow prism of 2012's Postalgate wars is as blinkered as denying that superior coaching can produce superior athletes.

There's plenty to criticise: causal links and bandwagon-hitching in particular. But accusations of hypocrisy (is it so hard to spell?) are too extreme. Congratulations to Ambassador Micron for smuggling some of the sport's evocative myths on her wagon.

Yeah, I'm sorry macca but I have to side with TWH here. If she was writing something ground breaking then it would be better, but there's nothing new or surprising about top athletes and depression. Radio 5 pump out a podcast a month or so on the subject...

TailWindHome wrote:

Not sure. The passage below certainly sticks in the craw.

Me neither. In 2012 I would be more likely to take a fundamentalist view. I think it's a cleaner landscape now so I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt.

mfin wrote:

RichN95 wrote:

The thing with writing about depression is that unless you are a mental health professional or writing from experience then you would be well advised to steer clear of the subject. There's enough misinformation on the subject as it is without adding half-baked theories and 100 year old stories to the pile.

This is dead on Rich.

It's one of the most on-the-money posts in these fora for quite some time. And I consider that quite an accolade as we have some very intelligent contributors.