Hehe Science

Cleat Eastwood
Cleat Eastwood Posts: 7,508
edited August 2012 in The bottom bracket
Truth_bde255_2937456.jpg
The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.

Comments

  • Secteur
    Secteur Posts: 1,971
    photo link broken, you useless man. honestly. try harder please.
  • t.m.h.n.e.t
    t.m.h.n.e.t Posts: 2,265
    Cleat is challenging knowledge and evolution by implying that like the image, science simply doesn't exist. But is itself a term used to quantify the fact that we constantly look for miniscule things to abuse.

    Off to the Big Girls In thread :lol:
  • Cleat Eastwood
    Cleat Eastwood Posts: 7,508
    I can see it - orbs aplenty. :D
    The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
    momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
  • OffTheBackAdam
    OffTheBackAdam Posts: 1,869
    Let me sort it out for you!
    Truth_bde255_2937456.jpg
    Right, not posting, I suspect because it has _ in the address, some websites don't like them

    http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Truth_ ... 937456.jpg
    Remember that you are an Englishman and thus have won first prize in the lottery of life.
  • Kieran_Burns
    Kieran_Burns Posts: 9,757
    edited August 2012
    T.M.H.N.E.T wrote:
    Cleat is challenging knowledge and evolution by implying that like the image, science simply doesn't exist. But is itself a term used to quantify the fact that we constantly look for miniscule things to abuse.

    Off to the Big Girls In thread :lol:

    We're not abusing and they're not that miniscule.

    I wonder if this is Schroedinger's thread? Are we in fact affecting that which is observed? Should we in actaulity NOT be looking at the image? Would the image BE an image if the image were not looked upon?

    Or should we just go off and fap at more Olympic babes?
    Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
    2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
    2011 Trek Madone 4.5
    2012 Felt F65X
    Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter
  • t.m.h.n.e.t
    t.m.h.n.e.t Posts: 2,265
    Kieran_Burns wrote:
    T.M.H.N.E.T wrote:
    Cleat is challenging knowledge and evolution by implying that like the image, science simply doesn't exist. But is itself a term used to quantify the fact that we constantly look for miniscule things to abuse.

    Off to the Big Girls In thread :lol:

    We're not abusing and they're not that miniscule.

    I wonder if this is Schoedinger's thread? Are we in fact affecting that which is observed? Should we in actaulity NOT be looking at the image? Would the image BE an image if the image were not looked upon?

    Or should we just go off and fap at more Olympic babes?

    Lets just fap,but not together :lol:
  • Blacktemplar
    Blacktemplar Posts: 713
    Kieran_Burns wrote:
    T.M.H.N.E.T wrote:
    Cleat is challenging knowledge and evolution by implying that like the image, science simply doesn't exist. But is itself a term used to quantify the fact that we constantly look for miniscule things to abuse.

    Off to the Big Girls In thread :lol:

    We're not abusing and they're not that miniscule.

    I wonder if this is Schroedinger's thread? Are we in fact affecting that which is observed? Should we in actaulity NOT be looking at the image? Would the image BE an image if the image were not looked upon?

    Or should we just go off and fap at more Olympic babes?
    If Schroedinger's involved, there should definitely be more pussy......
    "Get a bicycle. You won't regret it if you live"
    Mark Twain
  • Cleat Eastwood
    Cleat Eastwood Posts: 7,508
    Blacktemplar wrote:
    Kieran_Burns wrote:
    T.M.H.N.E.T wrote:
    Cleat is challenging knowledge and evolution by implying that like the image, science simply doesn't exist. But is itself a term used to quantify the fact that we constantly look for miniscule things to abuse.

    Off to the Big Girls In thread :lol:

    We're not abusing and they're not that miniscule.

    I wonder if this is Schroedinger's thread? Are we in fact affecting that which is observed? Should we in actaulity NOT be looking at the image? Would the image BE an image if the image were not looked upon?

    Or should we just go off and fap at more Olympic babes?
    If Schroedinger's involved, there should definitely be more pussy......

    or not :D
    The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
    momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
  • Kieran_Burns
    Kieran_Burns Posts: 9,757
    Cleat Eastwood wrote:
    Blacktemplar wrote:
    Kieran_Burns wrote:
    T.M.H.N.E.T wrote:
    Cleat is challenging knowledge and evolution by implying that like the image, science simply doesn't exist. But is itself a term used to quantify the fact that we constantly look for miniscule things to abuse.

    Off to the Big Girls In thread :lol:

    We're not abusing and they're not that miniscule.

    I wonder if this is Schroedinger's thread? Are we in fact affecting that which is observed? Should we in actaulity NOT be looking at the image? Would the image BE an image if the image were not looked upon?

    Or should we just go off and fap at more Olympic babes?
    If Schroedinger's involved, there should definitely be more pussy......

    or not :D

    Well, this thread just collapsed....
    Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
    2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
    2011 Trek Madone 4.5
    2012 Felt F65X
    Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter

Categories