Ride Time or Total Time - what do you use?

popette
popette Posts: 2,089
edited February 2008 in Training, fitness and health
Hiya,
I assumed that when quoting times/speeds, people were referring to their ride times (time spent moving & avg speed based on that) rather than the total time they were on the bike and overall avg speed. My first computer came with ride time set as the default so I just carried on with that.

When it comes to the Etape, I'm be looking only at total time as the broom wagon won't give a stuff about what my computer is telling me, but for everyday training I've been using ride time rather than total time.

What do you use on your bike computers?

Popette

Comments

  • NWLondoner
    NWLondoner Posts: 2,047
    I use ride time (auto pause) on my GPS 205 and total time on my Cycle Computer
  • redddraggon
    redddraggon Posts: 10,862
    Don't stop and your ride time is accurate. I try to avoid stopping when I'm out on a ride (traffic lights excepted).

    I never work out the average speed of my journey anyway, the computer just tells me the average over the total distance I've done, which includes slow commutes, long hill climbs and rapid descents, so the average means very little anyway.
    I like bikes...

    Twitter
    Flickr
  • Always total time. ride time is somehow kidding yourself.....
  • chrisw12
    chrisw12 Posts: 1,246
    Agree with Red. Ride time=total time as I never stop.

    This is great training idea and gives you an excuse to go through all trafic lights. When I go throught them I shout to the drivers 'average speed, average speed'

    Those cyclists who complain about red light jumpers are the ones with speedos on auto pause, they use the lights as an excuse to stop, wimps :wink:
  • normanp
    normanp Posts: 279
    It's got to be total time. I imagine I could do a pretty fast hilly 200k if I did it in 5 minute sprints with a day's rest in between (or long lunches / resting while others mend punctures etc...)
  • Jeff Jones
    Jeff Jones Posts: 1,865
    I use total time, 'cos I rarely have a computer on my bike. Traffic lights and short stops get absorbed into the overall time, but I don't usually count stopping at a cafe or fixing a puncture. These happen infrequently anyway.

    When I used to have a computer, I did use the auto stop/start function. As far as your fitness is concerned, it matters little.
    Jeff Jones

    Product manager, Sports
  • Mettan
    Mettan Posts: 2,103
    I reset my bike computer before every training ride so as to get an accurate reading - did a 6.85 mile loop this morning with an average of 17.4 mph - it can be frustrating at lights etc, but I tend to pick reasonable routes both in terms of obstacles and road surface were possible (also enjoy using MapMyRide now - can check out your route and elevation profile in advance).
  • Positron
    Positron Posts: 191
    Definitely "ride time". That way you get a better average. Also what would happed if you set off and forgot to press go? The world would end as you'd have missed miles!

    p.
    Never order anti-pasta to arrive at the same time as pasta.
  • ut_och_cykla
    ut_och_cykla Posts: 1,594
    Ride time for me - but with Popettes 'broom wagon' comments in the back of my mind.
    If I'm just 'training' I'm usually out in the countryside and only need to stop for calls of nature or mechanicals.
    normanp's comments remind me of my hubby who has ridden Vaettern rundan in Sweden (300km) with a sub - 12 hour ride time but a 17 hour total time.... :)
  • Mike Willcox
    Mike Willcox Posts: 1,770
    None of the above.

    All my rides are non stop unless mechanical failure or puncture. Anyway it is what it is. You ride, you train, you recover, you improve and you perform depending on what you've actually done. Recording a figure is going to change diddly squat
  • There are certain fixed routes where I monitor my times to see how much (if any) I've improved (or gone backwards), so I always use ride times to give me a more realistic idea of my performance. Using total time I could put in the ride of my life and still appear slower than normal because of waits at a couple of bad junctions!

    I think the longer your ride, the less it matters - all my timed routes are currently less than about fifteen miles so an extra minute or two is noticable. As I increase the distances I'll probably keep using ride time out of habit, I expect so long as you measure yourself the same way every time you'll get a reasonable idea how you're doing.
    Even if the voices aren't real, they have some very good ideas.
  • Only watch the clock to make sure I'm back in time for whatever it is I have to be back for - appointment, work, girl, drink ;)
  • DaveyL
    DaveyL Posts: 5,167
    Or

    E: All of the above...
    Le Blaireau (1)
  • phil s
    phil s Posts: 1,128
    Has to be ride time as I live in central London and there are so many frickin traffic lights before I get to lanes where it's non stop. I usually phase my training to have a neutral start, then a warm-up section, then the real stuff starts when I'm on the open roads. Likewise I factor in some of the return leg through central London as cool-down time.
    -- Dirk Hofman Motorhomes --
  • oldwelshman
    oldwelshman Posts: 4,733
    Have to agree with Mike and Jeff.
    I dont even bother with times other than watching my watch to judge when it will get dark so I ensure I get home before sundown :D
    Every day, every ride can be different depending how you feel, conditions and your effort so times are meaningless unless it is a tt.
    I did reliability ride on weekend but did not bother checking it the end ( is it really worth doing to get an A4 paper with Gold on it? :D ) I just did it for the training.
    Perhaps some one is out there looking for me as I did not check in? :D
    I did pay my £4 though unlike some riders I noticed tagging on to ride along route at various points !!
    Anyway Popette just finish your ride and get an official time :D
  • Mike Willcox
    Mike Willcox Posts: 1,770
    Have to agree with Mike and Jeff.
    I dont even bother with times other than watching my watch to judge when it will get dark so I ensure I get home before sundown :D
    Every day, every ride can be different depending how you feel, conditions and your effort so times are meaningless unless it is a tt.
    I did reliability ride on weekend but did not bother checking it the end ( is it really worth doing to get an A4 paper with Gold on it? :D ) I just did it for the training.
    Perhaps some one is out there looking for me as I did not check in? :D
    I did pay my £4 though unlike some riders I noticed tagging on to ride along route at various points !!
    Anyway Popette just finish your ride and get an official time :D

    Blimey that's the second time you've agreed with me is less than a week. I'm going to lose my reputation for being controversial now.
  • HIi there.

    Once again I'm agreeing with Mike, Jeff and the old welsh fellow. I must be getting old myself...

    When I first started out I bought every gadget I could afford - and fit on the handlebars. These days I make do with a wristwatch - if I remember to put it on. Although I do have a computer on the TT bike.

    Rides go down in the diary as hours and minutes - I don't see the point in recording speeds or distances unless it's a specific interval set.

    Old Welshman - whaddya mean you didn't check at the end of your reliability ride? How did you get on in the sprint? These are races right? ;-)

    Cheers, Andy

    ps I'm organising a reliability 17th Feb in Stirling for any locals - see this link for details:
    http://www.stirlingtri.co.uk/ClubEvents ... fault.aspx
  • Mike Willcox
    Mike Willcox Posts: 1,770
    The problem as I see it, from training to a predetermined schedule, is that there are assumptions made re the rider's recovery and state of fitness. This is governed by what happened yesterday and the days before. For a rider to fulfill a scheduled amount of training then they have to exercise discipline over their intensity levels. Easier said then done.

    I wll set out later this morning to ride for approximately 2 .5 hours at a moderate intensity but my route will consist of different circuits so that if at any time I get too cold or feel heavy legged then my direct route home will be 45 minutes at the furtherest most point. In this way I'm not going to get stranded with no energy miles from home.

    I have a theory there is a well that you draw from which is labelled "testing yourself to the limit" and it's resources are not infinite neither is it the way to improve from a training perspective.
  • oldwelshman
    oldwelshman Posts: 4,733
    Have to agree with Mike and Jeff.
    I dont even bother with times other than watching my watch to judge when it will get dark so I ensure I get home before sundown :D
    Every day, every ride can be different depending how you feel, conditions and your effort so times are meaningless unless it is a tt.
    I did reliability ride on weekend but did not bother checking it the end ( is it really worth doing to get an A4 paper with Gold on it? :D ) I just did it for the training.
    Perhaps some one is out there looking for me as I did not check in? :D
    I did pay my £4 though unlike some riders I noticed tagging on to ride along route at various points !!
    Anyway Popette just finish your ride and get an official time :D

    Blimey that's the second time you've agreed with me is less than a week. I'm going to lose my reputation for being controversial now.

    I have agreed lots of times Mie, think your getting me confused with Alex, must be your age 8)
  • Mike Willcox
    Mike Willcox Posts: 1,770
    I have agreed lots of times Mie, think your getting me confused with Alex, must be your age 8)

    Actually you're right. But is it me or has Alex been agreeing with me on some issues and Andrew a couple of times as well? Even Toks was talking about RPE the other day.

    Have I changed my views or have others come around a tad?

    I believe I'm saying the same things now that I was two or three years ago, when I was getting attacked from all sides for being old skool and a luddite. This tended to make me grumpy and it all got a bit personal. Maybe we've all matured a bit now and can see the other's point of view.
  • blimey, training is turning into one big love in......
  • i use metres climbed
  • jhop
    jhop Posts: 369
    Always total time. ride time is somehow kidding yourself.....

    Agreed I get a bit frustrated to hear of apparently fantastic times achieved on Sportives only to find that when food stops etc are included the 'real' time is much greater.

    Lets face it we could all do a fast 100 with enough stops but who would we be kidding and to what purpose.

    As others have posted start- ride - finish keep stops to a minimum.

    On the etape and similar big rides however it is fair enough to quote times from when the rider passes the start mat rather than the 'real' start as you often remain static for quite a while.
  • jhop wrote:
    Always total time. ride time is somehow kidding yourself.....

    Agreed I get a bit frustrated to hear of apparently fantastic times achieved on Sportives only to find that when food stops etc are included the 'real' time is much greater.

    Lets face it we could all do a fast 100 with enough stops but who would we be kidding and to what purpose.

    As others have posted start- ride - finish keep stops to a minimum.

    On the etape and similar big rides however it is fair enough to quote times from when the rider passes the start mat rather than the 'real' start as you often remain static for quite a while.

    It's highly significant for a 100 mile TT believe me....but your point about sportives and similar events is valid.