One lucky dude

in Road general
Just picked.this up on local news website, boy was this guy lucky.
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/local-news/horrifying-dashcam-images-show-cyclist-5940513
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/local-news/horrifying-dashcam-images-show-cyclist-5940513
Too many bikes according to Mrs O.
0
Posts
I particularly like the one who wouldn't be able to repair his / her car as they are on benefits.
I thought benefits were to feed and clothe you, not buy you a car!!
He was a censored (by competitive triathlete standards) swimmer (his words) and was dedicated enough to get lessons with all the little kids at our local swimming club - coach said it would take him a good few years to become half decent.
He came out of the water in one triathlon virtually last. By the end of the bike leg he was top 3! None too shabby at running either!!!
I’m glad to hear he wasn’t badly injured. The comments after the rag that is the Daily Mail ran the story are absolutely insane with the usual road tax, toys, shouldn’t be on the road type censored . It’s appalling.
It's a warning to drivers to not drive like twats, but also to riders to expect drivers to drive like twats.
https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/moment-leeds-man-thrown-flying-21614760
Shocking but not surprising, which is the depressing part.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
You can see that he's braking and swerving right himself and can't avoid the car because the driver has no idea he is there. He has pretty much stopped by the time he's hit and is still on the right hand part of the painted death circle.
Not sure what more he could have done other than got off and walk.
I’ve seen the video on Insta, it’s pretty grim viewing TBH. How on earth he walked away from that is beyond me. A miracle.
I’d love to know what (if any) action is taken against the driver.
Certainly no need for some of the comments posted in various places. Hopefully some driver re-education / points and compensation for the cyclist.
The general standard of driving has dropped IMO and an overall lack of attention and considerstion seems more prevalent. I don't think it is a driver vs cyclist issue, but more a fall in general care displayed on the road.
I used to see a really careless, or even reckless piece of driving, once or twice a year (not necessarily involving me), now it seems more a weekly occurence.
These things are a lottery.
The length of the ban need not necessarily be linked to what happened, but what could've happened. You can have a lifelong unblemished record, but a moment's inattention at the wrong time could cost someone their life. On the other hand, you could drive on the wrong side of the road at 80mph on a residential street, drunk, texting, and by sheer good fortune not injure anyone. I'd suggest that second scenario deserves a longer ban. On that basis, though the cyclist here wasn't seriously hurt, the driver should be removed from the roads for a long time.
There should be life bans for the very worst offences.
If you want to kill someone use a car as the weapon. Just make it look like an accident.
I am not sure. You have no chance.
The drivers are usually doing around half the speed limit as well, 5-10 years ago you'd assume they were drink driving.
The driver is entirely in the wrong, but when I've been hit by a car, I've found that hasn't made it hurt any less. He is indeed very lucky that the reckless, inattentive and idiotic driver didn't do more damage, because that was a bad one.
You could say well assume no one will stop, but if you do that in practice it isn't possible to enter a junction, or alternatively you'll get rear ended. In practice you enter with a plan B. Usually hitting the brakes.
He was going quite fast, I do agree. But when he entered the junction the driver was either going to stop, or he was going to pass behind the vehicle, or he would need to stop.
He didn't factor in the vehicle veering towards him on the wrong side of the road and the driver failing to see a large object right in front of them for several seconds.
But is that realistic?
Winning £20 on a scratchcard then coming home to a blowie and a Cadbury's cream egg is lucky - that bloke had a total #shitday.
I suspect that these people believe the rules don’t apply to them due to a sense of entitlement as their journey is more important than your safety.
A "debate" following one bad example finished with her saying "I never cross the white line when overtaking cyclists.". They walk (drive) along us. 🤬
I am not sure. You have no chance.
I assume he discovered that driving on the verge was breaking the plates in the kitchenette.
His wife shouted "get out of the middle of the road" as I re passed him. I think it made her man feel less stupid for driving off the side of the road and then messing up his wee gear changes.
People must overtake. They must. Immediately.
It's amazing how many are happy to take a chance. Another example from last year, near the top of another hill. I could hear a car approach from behind me, at a fair speed. Glancing behind, I could see it already pulled across the road to pass. What I could also see, but the driver couldn't, because they were further down the road, was another car coming the other way, performing an identical manoeuvre to pass another cyclist. I made a vigorous "stay back" gesture to the driver behind me, which fortunately they took heed of, averting a high speed head on collision between the two cars (which might well have also taken out me and the other cyclist).
It seems to be nearly always either taking a chance on the road they can't see being clear, or a close pass. I once conducted a sort of impromptu survey of this sort of thing, and found that when the road was visibly clear, something like 95% had no problem with leaving plenty room, but when there was something coming, even just one car that would be gone in a few seconds, getting on for 90% would either squeeze past, pass while leaving enough room but then cut sharply in front, or both. The conclusion must be motorists do know how to overtake safely, but most can't be bothered to if it causes them the smallest delay.
At pinch points I always ride in primary. Makes them think about it at least.
You have to be immune to insults and gestures though. 😉
I am not sure. You have no chance.
Personally I can't stand Glasgow. Any of it.
This is not an objective opinion given how nice parts of the city are, but you don't necessarily have much control over these feelings.