Flying to outer space
Comments
-
-
-
can this bloke not get anything right0
-
Exactly surrey_commuter_*version 2* (not the real surrey_commuter).It's a shame it didn't launch, it's understandable with the complexities involved though. Next time.
0 -
whilst I agree I do think it poor form to not be clear what you have donefocuszing723 said:
Exactly SC.surrey_commuter said:It's a shame it didn't launch, it's understandable with the complexities involved though. Next time.
0 -
Second time lucky (until it exploded).0
-
That rocket science is tricky. Who knew?The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
I am not sure. You have no chance.Veronese68 wrote:PB is the most sensible person on here.0 -
-
It was a successful launch. Not exploding was the stretch goal.0
-
Good that it launched with the booster, but yes, I was expecting it to go a little further in the direction of space (I know it was to test separation). You'd be disappointed, but they've got that great success with Falcon 9, so you know they will get there with Starship.
I thought the cheering and hollering is a bit over the top every five minutes in the Spacex HQ. Yeah, sure when it takes off.0 -
The term is "good data". It's fair enough really.0
-
Test separation certainty seems like it was a success, you couldn't ask for it to have separated much more.- Genesis Croix de Fer
- Dolan Tuono0 -
0
-
Yep, bloody stupid thing.briantrumpet said:Oof. Rapid unscheduled demolition.
0 -
Apparently the authorities aren't keen on massive blocks of concrete flying for a mile out to sea or broken windows 6 miles away.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/24/spacex-starship-explosion-spread-particulate-matter-for-miles.html0 -
0
https://youtu.be/L5QXreqOrTA
