Forum home Mountain biking forum MTB buying advice

Fuji Nevada 2.1 Vs GT Palomar

m_elecm_elec Posts: 3
edited October 2015 in MTB buying advice
i am going to buy a bicycle up to 350$ and the best bikes i have found are
Fuji Nevada 2.1 and GT Palomar
i know both have steel frame but i dont know which one is better in details.
which one do you suggest? and why?
i have to add i realy can not bring up my budget.
thank you all.


  • cooldadcooldad Posts: 32,599
    Links help, and judging from the $ sign you are not in the UK. HK, NZ,Oz, Canada, maybe the US?

    As this is mainly a UK site it might not be too helpful.
    I don't do smileys.

    There is no secret ingredient - Kung Fu Panda

    London Calling on Facebook

  • m_elecm_elec Posts: 3
    well acyualy yes i am not in the UK
    but the bikes i mention are all over the world. and the fuji u can get in the uk i can get in my place too.
    i just need some help to find out which one are better to get.
  • supersonicsupersonic Posts: 82,708 Lives Here
    We need the links to the bikes you have seen, as can be variations in models depending on year.
  • rockmonkeyscrockmonkeysc Posts: 14,774
    In other countries bikes which are cheap here are expensive. They also quite often have different builds in different countries.
    At UK prices both of those bikes are terrible compared to other similar priced bikes but in your country (Zimbabwe?) they could be great compared to other similar priced bikes.
Sign In or Register to comment.