Giant Advanced v's Giant Advanced Pro

Hello folks,
been looking to upgrade my Defy Composite to a 2015 Defy Advanced but I no longer see Composite frames on Giant's Website & I am sceptical about whether the Advanced is now the old Composite?
Can anyone shed any light on this as Giant's site doesn't have any info(that I can find)about the Advanced Pro,so is it 'spec' thing or something else?
Thanks.
been looking to upgrade my Defy Composite to a 2015 Defy Advanced but I no longer see Composite frames on Giant's Website & I am sceptical about whether the Advanced is now the old Composite?
Can anyone shed any light on this as Giant's site doesn't have any info(that I can find)about the Advanced Pro,so is it 'spec' thing or something else?
Thanks.
C49
0
Posts
2015 giant propel advanced 1
2015 Genesis day one disc ss
2014 giant roam 2
Source : I work in a shop which just got the new TCR Advanced in
http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb/tec ... rdrive/50/
Yes I spotted that and that was my understanding of the hybrid fork as opposed to the full carbon fork. However ElliottDavo above seems to be saying that both models have full composite forks.
The Hybrid could be from two carbon moulds joined, though I'm speculating at that point. It's definitely carbon at the top, it used an expander plug and not an A-head star nut.
I was curious about the steering tube width in my store, so I pulled one out
Was that the TCR Advanced you mentioned earlier or the Defy Advanced?
2015 TCR Advanced 3
http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb/bik ... 191/77282/
2014 Defy Composite 1
http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb/bik ... 976/66539/
2014 Giant Defy Composite 1
On One 4560b
2015 TCR Adv. 3 is performance race geo. shorter wheel base, longer top tube and shorter head tube
TT 55.5
HT 15.0
CS 40.5
WB 98.0
HA 73 deg.
SA 73 deg.
2014 Defy Comp 1 performance endurance geo. longer wheel base, shorter top tube and longer head tube
TT 54.5
HT 16.5
CS 42.0
WB 99.5
HA 72.5 deg.
SA 73.5 deg.
Look at the difference in the seat stays, on the TCR they appear to intersect the seat tube and flow into the top tube and seem thicker. Also the head tube, top tube and down tube intersection moulding is more substantial.
I understand that a shorter wheelbase (and chainstays) can make for more agile/livelier handling bike - which can make a frame 'racier', but from what I can see of the differences between the geometries - would it be correct to assume that the head-tube length is a (or the) determining factor?
2014 Giant Defy Composite 1
On One 4560b
Tighter frame clearances can sometimes mean the bike is limited to 23mm tyres.
http://road.cc/content/buyers-guide/117 ... road-bikes
The Defy also has a stack more spacers under the stem to play with.
That is good to know, what wheel and tyre combo. are you using, I assume your bike has rim caliper brakes?
I was using Campag Shamal clinchers with Conti GP4000S tyres but have recently gone to Wheelsmith tubulars with Vittoria tyres.