Sidwewall blowout Conti GP4000 S

Hals1967
Hals1967 Posts: 231
edited June 2014 in Road general
Had my front tyre blow out a mile into my ride today. No warning just an almighty bang, luckily wasn't going fast and even more luckily it didn't happen on the 40+ mph descent I had planned into my route later on. The sidewall had split away from the Kevlar bead. Annoying because the tyre is only a month old with about 300 miles on it. I've read about problems with them before but I guess it can happen to any tyre. I did check my pressures prior to the ride and the tyres looked ok, properly seated etc.
After a walk home and fitting a spare tyre I was back out again but was wary for the whole route and took it very steady on the descents. :shock:


1967 Engine

Comments

  • sungod
    sungod Posts: 17,386
    may have been ut by a bit of debris or catching the edge of one of the millions of dents/cracks in the awful uk roads, but i'd also check...

    rim for any sharp edge/burr

    brake pad alignment

    ...i've used these tyres for years, they are fairly light, so more vulnerable to damage, but never heard of any general quality issue

    if you're convinced it's a manufacturing fault, claim it under warranty, you'll get a replacement
    my bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny
  • Terrytibbs
    Terrytibbs Posts: 76
    I think you'd happily get a new tyre from Conti.

    Out of interest, where did you get the tyre from?
  • rickeverett
    rickeverett Posts: 988
    This is very interesting because I just changed to a new set of GP4000s as my old ones lost threads between where the clincher lip meets the wall of the tyre!!

    There was a thread about this disintegration issue on here a couple if months back. There's also same reports on other forums if you do a Google search.
    viewtopic.php?f=40013&t=12935132&p=18798569&hilit=gp4000#p18798569

    Black threads worked loose on the tyre in this area but it didn't seem to have effected the inter threads and wall itself.

    Wonder if this is related ?????
  • dowtcha
    dowtcha Posts: 442
    sungod wrote:
    may have been ut by a bit of debris or catching the edge of one of the millions of dents/cracks in the awful uk roads, but i'd also check...

    rim for any sharp edge/burr

    brake pad alignment

    ...i've used these tyres for years, they are fairly light, so more vulnerable to damage, but never heard of any general quality issue

    if you're convinced it's a manufacturing fault, claim it under warranty, you'll get a replacement

    As above, check that the brake alignment is not rubbing against the tyre.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,701
    It get's forgotton that they re a Race Tyre not a training tyre and so will wear out quicker than other tyres and also sacrifice longevity and (in your case) protection.

    In Holland with beautiful bike paths and smooth tarmac mine lasted for ages but I have but say I ve been surprised how quickly they ve worn in the UK (have to say that I can't remember exactly when I put them on to say how far they ve gone) and I'm going to put something a bit tougher on now that can cope with London roads...not sure what yet though...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • andi1363
    andi1363 Posts: 350
    I used to love GP4000's but a spate of sidewall failures has seen me lose faith in these tyres. The 4 seasons on my training/commute/winter bike have been fine as have my Ultra sports on my training wheels.
  • rickeverett
    rickeverett Posts: 988
    andi1363 wrote:
    I used to love GP4000's but a spate of sidewall failures has seen me lose faith in these tyres. The 4 seasons on my training/commute/winter bike have been fine as have my Ultra sports on my training wheels.


    were the failures rips and holes in the side wall itself or the thread problem?
  • itsnotarace
    itsnotarace Posts: 518
    Was the sidewall failure the cause or the symptom of the blowout? I find it difficult to believe the sidewall failed on it own, unless it was damaged by a cut, or by the inner tube exploding
  • hypster
    hypster Posts: 1,229
    I think it's telling that there are so many stories of GP4000 S sidewall failures on various cycling forums around the internet. Maybe the sidewalls are not failing on their own per se but they sure seem to be very susceptible to damage from either ham-fisted fitting or road debris.

    When compared to equivalent tyres from other manufacturers I think they are expensive and as such are bargepole territory for me. Why pay more for something which has no performance benefits and could be basically flawed with catastrophic results?
  • cougie
    cougie Posts: 22,512
    I've used these since 2008 and I think I've had just the one p*ncture with them. No blowouts. Much better than the Vredesteins and Michelins I used to use. They're not cheap tyres - but they've been great performers for me.

    As to performance benefits - they always come out top in tests ?
  • sungod
    sungod Posts: 17,386
    hypster wrote:
    I think it's telling that there are so many stories of GP4000 S sidewall failures on various cycling forums around the internet. Maybe the sidewalls are not failing on their own per se but they sure seem to be very susceptible to damage from either ham-fisted fitting or road debris.

    When compared to equivalent tyres from other manufacturers I think they are expensive and as such are bargepole territory for me. Why pay more for something which has no performance benefits and could be basically flawed with catastrophic results?

    number of stories of failure is irrelevant

    number of failures per unit distance is the relevant statistic

    i certainly do not know this number, but from years of direct experience and general observation i would bet it is no worse that any tyre of comparable weight, performance and purpose

    because of their good performance, especially in the wet where some otherwise similar tyres perform poorly, these are popular tyres, widely ridden, for many years, it would be remarkable if there were not many reports of failure
    my bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny
  • hypster
    hypster Posts: 1,229
    sungod wrote:
    number of stories of failure is irrelevant

    number of failures per unit distance is the relevant statistic

    i certainly do not know this number, but from years of direct experience and general observation i would bet it is no worse that any tyre of comparable weight, performance and purpose

    because of their good performance, especially in the wet where some otherwise similar tyres perform poorly, these are popular tyres, widely ridden, for many years, it would be remarkable if there were not many reports of failure

    You'd bet your life on it would you? Because that's what you are doing.
  • jackc6549
    jackc6549 Posts: 30
    Think it's a case of some people being unlucky. I did about 5500 miles last year using Gp4000s tyres. One puncture, which was a small (5-6mm long) rip in the sidewall on the rear. This was caused by hitting a pothole about 30mph, no fault of the tyre. I don't think any tyre would have survived that.
  • junglist_matty
    junglist_matty Posts: 1,731
    Happened to me last year but was fairly minor, my tyre was about 1000 miles old....

    a27a74e0bc7411e28e0922000a9f1335_7.jpg

    I still ride GP4000s tyres, they're great.... With so many people riding these tyres, it's no wander there are so many people with these sorts of stories to tell, they are one of the most popular "race bike" tyre out there so of course with higher use, there'll be higher number of these stories.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,701
    Interesting that they ve put the snakeskin thingum on the new version...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • itsnotarace
    itsnotarace Posts: 518
    Happened to me last year but was fairly minor, my tyre was about 1000 miles old....

    Looks like a cut from road debris to me
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    ddraver wrote:
    Interesting that they ve put the snakeskin thingum on the new version...

    except they haven't....
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,701
    well you re a pleasant individual arent you...

    No they have nt, some vectran thingum instead
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    ddraver wrote:
    well you re a pleasant individual arent you...

    No they have nt, some vectran thingum instead

    The GP4000S has always had a vectran layer, but never had the 'gatorskin' band. Apologies if my correction upset you. Next time, I will add a load of smilies to make it more bearable...
  • apreading
    apreading Posts: 4,535
    Good summary of the GP4000S II here: http://www.slowtwitch.com/Products/Thin ... _3946.html

    Seems that coloured sidewalls and a new 28mm size are the differences.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,701
    Hmm we'll I broke and got some Schwalbe Ones off of ze Germans so I be probably failed to go for a more durable tyre but they were sooooo cheap...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • Hals1967
    Hals1967 Posts: 231
    This is very interesting because I just changed to a new set of GP4000s as my old ones lost threads between where the clincher lip meets the wall of the tyre!!
    quote]
    Inspecting the tyre today it looks like this above is what's happened, the threads in the clincher lip have separated from the tyre wall and caused the inner tube to bulge out and most likely caught the brake causing the inner to blow. I was riding on a reasonably smooth section at the time so can count out hitting a pothole or any kind of debris.
    I've ordered a new GP4000 S anyhow as I'm happy with them and will put this one down to a bad tyre (I didn't mention this is the third set of GP4000's I've used so can vouch for their general quality and good performance).
    Now if the next one blows...oh crikey I've ordered on Fri 13th :wink:


    1967 Engine
  • rickeverett
    rickeverett Posts: 988
    Hals1967 wrote:
    This is very interesting because I just changed to a new set of GP4000s as my old ones lost threads between where the clincher lip meets the wall of the tyre!!
    quote]

    Inspecting the tyre today it looks like this above is what's happened, the threads in the clincher lip have separated from the tyre wall and caused the inner tube to bulge out and most likely caught the brake causing the inner to blow. I was riding on a reasonably smooth section at the time so can count out hitting a pothole or any kind of debris.
    I've ordered a new GP4000 S anyhow as I'm happy with them and will put this one down to a bad tyre (I didn't mention this is the third set of GP4000's I've used so can vouch for their general quality and good performance).
    Now if the next one blows...oh crikey I've ordered on Fri 13th :wink:


    was it like these pics (mine was the 2nd pic) ?

    viewtopic.php?f=40013&t=12935132&hilit=gp4000&start=80
  • adamfo
    adamfo Posts: 763
    apreading wrote:
    Good summary of the GP4000S II here: http://www.slowtwitch.com/Products/Thin ... _3946.html

    Seems that coloured sidewalls and a new 28mm size are the differences.

    See this thread

    viewtopic.php?f=40013&t=12971361
  • Hals1967
    Hals1967 Posts: 231


    was it like these pics (mine was the 2nd pic) ?

    viewtopic.php?f=40013&t=12935132&hilit=gp4000&start=80

    Very similar except the sidewall had split away from the beading along a length of about three inches with multiple strands that comprise the beading coming apart.

    Anyhow, I've put this to bed now but it's a good general heads up to have a closer look at your tyres more often.


    1967 Engine
  • rickeverett
    rickeverett Posts: 988
    Hals1967 wrote:


    was it like these pics (mine was the 2nd pic) ?

    viewtopic.php?f=40013&t=12935132&hilit=gp4000&start=80

    Very similar except the sidewall had split away from the beading along a length of about three inches with multiple strands that comprise the beading coming apart.

    Anyhow, I've put this to bed now but it's a good general heads up to have a closer look at your tyres more often.

    For the thousands if not millions of these sold world wide there always bound to be a issue now and then. TBH it sounds like something shredded through.
  • g00se
    g00se Posts: 2,221
    A friend has a Conti 4000s front sidewall blow out descending the Cormet de Roselend last week - just managed to keep it from throwing him. He's since heard that this is a recent frequent failure on the tyres from a mechanic.
  • rickeverett
    rickeverett Posts: 988
    g00se wrote:
    A friend has a Conti 4000s front sidewall blow out descending the Cormet de Roselend last week - just managed to keep it from throwing him. He's since heard that this is a recent frequent failure on the tyres from a mechanic.

    Shit. Wonder if he had the thread decay issue too? Has to take a catalyst of some sort to blow out a wall.
  • le_patron
    le_patron Posts: 494
    I've had two brand new GP4000 tyres blow out like this in quick succession.

    First one blew suddenly, sent it back to Wiggle, they sent a new one and that blew in exactly the same way this eve, a small tear in the sidewall that allowed the inner tube to bulge through slowly and then - BANG !

    There must be a manufacturing fault, I've used these tyres for donkeys years, always fit them the same way and the rims are fine.

    I'm steering clear now as lost confidence in them if this is a new design.
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,701
    ddraver wrote:
    Hmm we'll I broke and got some Schwalbe Ones off of ze Germans so I be probably failed to go for a more durable tyre but they were sooooo cheap...

    Tried these today. Feel really good (although it's a classic case of old tyre v new tyre). If you re looking for an alternative I can recommend these, although they do feel a tad thin...
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver