Genesis Equilibrium decison
![chris217](https://forum.bikeradar.com/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
chris217
Posts: 218
guys , hope you will excuse my interrupting however i need some help;
i am looking to change from a Spesh SL3 to an Equilibrium, reasons ? i am looking for sonething more practical that I can ride , commute , long distance endurance, train and sportive on come rain or shine !
i know there are many more steel options, Condor, Charge etc but the Genesis is on the money as frame and forks £400 which is pretty much my limit
and want to avoid the fragility of carbon , as while carbon is not paper i would still rather lean a steel bike up against a brick wall or metal fence than a carbon bike ..
issue is weight and losing the snap acceleration ...which i will but wondered whether there are any carbon to steel converts who have good experience. i was just concerned about a few comments saying the Genesis was 'ponderous' and slow. i am aware the steel ride is completely different and i will be getting a frame and putting an Ultegra / dura ace groupset with DT Swiss wheels so it will probably be fine but need some reassurance as i am not quite ready to join the local audax club ( nothing wrong with that ) and still want to be 'competative....
cheers for any input
i am looking to change from a Spesh SL3 to an Equilibrium, reasons ? i am looking for sonething more practical that I can ride , commute , long distance endurance, train and sportive on come rain or shine !
i know there are many more steel options, Condor, Charge etc but the Genesis is on the money as frame and forks £400 which is pretty much my limit
and want to avoid the fragility of carbon , as while carbon is not paper i would still rather lean a steel bike up against a brick wall or metal fence than a carbon bike ..
issue is weight and losing the snap acceleration ...which i will but wondered whether there are any carbon to steel converts who have good experience. i was just concerned about a few comments saying the Genesis was 'ponderous' and slow. i am aware the steel ride is completely different and i will be getting a frame and putting an Ultegra / dura ace groupset with DT Swiss wheels so it will probably be fine but need some reassurance as i am not quite ready to join the local audax club ( nothing wrong with that ) and still want to be 'competative....
cheers for any input
0
Comments
-
Anybody who describes the Genesis as 'slow and ponderous' really doesn't know what they are talking about and should be ignored and avoided.
I have a blinged up Basso carbon bike and a very nice aluminium Principia - I haven't ridden either of them since building up my Genesis. At 10kg it's around 3Kg heavier than the other two but I can't say that it's noticeably slower and if I had to keep only one bike, this would be it.Basso Astra
Principia Ellipse SX
Kinesis Racelight 4S
Kinesis Crosslight Pro Disc0 -
You may notice any extra weight when climbing, especailly if its on the wheels. Otherwise it probably won't make too much difference. I did notice the weight on my steel bikes but then I do a lot of climbing. Weight isn't everything though; comfort is important.'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.0
-
thanks guys, and Asprillia i have read the 30 pages of Genesis notes as well.
i agree and in the scheme of things the comfort and 'engagement' you get from a decent steel bike as so much different from that of a carbon frame. my Sl3 is a £2000 frame yet while responsive and pretty smooth , it works and is functional but i feel it is actually a bit soulless !!! i must be getting old ....but think i am going take the step and sell the SL3 and get the Genesis ....cheers0 -
A review of the Equilibrium 20 has just appreared on BR. It got 3.5 out of 5 stars and appears to have lost points for being steel (i.e. a bit heavier) and the brakes being a bit crap (which fair enough, seems to be a common complaint). I don't get why reviews like this penalise the bike for being steel. As they point out in the same review, anyone who wants a steel bike isn't after the lightest possibe ride anyway.
I can imagine a review of less than 4 stars would put some people off even if they had already settled on a steel bike with its inherent weight "penalty"0 -
If my Racelight Tk got trashed or stolen I'd be buying an Equilibrium tomorrow. I'd buy it from Epic and get to choose all the bits.0
-
Steve236 wrote:A review of the Equilibrium 20 has just appreared on BR. It got 3.5 out of 5 stars and appears to have lost points for being steel (i.e. a bit heavier) and the brakes being a bit crap (which fair enough, seems to be a common complaint). I don't get why reviews like this penalise the bike for being steel. As they point out in the same review, anyone who wants a steel bike isn't after the lightest possibe ride anyway.
Yeah, I find it weird too.
Brake wise, just swap out the callipers for Shimano R650s and away you go.Mud - Genesis Vapour CCX
Race - Fuji Norcom Straight
Sun - Cervelo R3
Winter / Commute - Dolan ADX0 -
Earlier BR reviews for the same bike give it a higher rating so I really can't see where they're coming from. I would recommend buying the frame and fork separately and building up with your own bits if you can get deals etc.
I did the same for mine and it came in at just over £1000 for a better spec'd bike than the Equilibrium 20 including a nice set of handbuilt wheels and a CK headset
If not that, then most owners do seem to recommend swapping the calipers for Shimano R650sBasso Astra
Principia Ellipse SX
Kinesis Racelight 4S
Kinesis Crosslight Pro Disc0