Garmin 500 vs 800

woozor

Im looking for a more advanced cycling computer.

Im torn between the Garmin 500 and 800.

I'm not sure If the maps turn by turn directions will be needed that often as I know most routes by memory. I do want the HRM and speed cadence. So I just am not that sure if the extra money for the 800 is worth it. Sure its more stylish but is it worth the extra money :?

I just want to be able to view my routes Ive riden with its releveant data, Time completed elevation graphs the lot.

nochekmate

Given your requirements, the 500 series will serve you well.

danlikesbikes

If your not that bothered by the extras and your not going to use them the 500 is what you need.

However have a quick google search for deals on the 800 and see if you find something at a price you can justify as thats the real question to answer. It would be nice to have the higher model but can you find a deal that makes it worth your while to buy

giarc

I was in the same boat and opted for the 500. You can also plan a route ahead of your ride and he 500 will give you directions via a 'breadcrumb' style naviagtion.

Bordersroadie

I was in the same dilemma but I think I will go for the 500. The 800 has features not really needed by me and the 500 is lighter and less bulky, apart from in itself being an amazing bit of kit.

I've read lots about the breadcrumb trail but how does it work? Do I understand correctly that you effectively upload your route then (I realise it does not have actual mapping) get little "turn left here" turn right there" directions on the unit itself?

Sorry to slightly hijack. . .

I am the god of hell fire

Bordersroadie wrote:

Do I understand correctly that you effectively upload your route then (I realise it does not have actual mapping) get little "turn left here" turn right there" directions on the unit itself?

Yes!

I love gizmos but couldnt justify the 800 over the 500
For the few times I strike out and really need to stick to a route the 500's breadcrumb thing is fine
Some websites also allow you to put up the turn indicators you mentioned - some dont

Im very happy with mine although borrowed a 705 on holiday which once again got me thinking.........
The nav function really is pretty flash however unnecessary for me in the cold light of day

nickel

I'd definately reccomend the 500, absolutely love it! Even though it doesn't have the full mapping features of the 800, like others have said you do get a primitive breadcrumb style navigation with an arrow telling you to turn right, left etc which is perfectly adequate for navigating sections of routes you don't know off by heart (I just personally wouldn't trust it to guide me round a long ride somewhere I dont know).

woozor

Out of interest Is the HRM required to determine calorie consumption?

nickel

Nope its not, when you set the garmin up you enter age, sex, weight, height etc and it calculates it from that. Not particularly convinced of its accuracy though I have to say.

thefd

Hey mate just out of interest did you get the 500? What are your thoughts of it?

I'm in the same boat as you were. Not sure whether to get the 500 or the 800 - or....whether to just keep using the iphone. Most of my rides are less than 4 hours so the iphone works, but if I do a longer sportive then the battery doesn't last.

As I said just wondering if you are happy with your purchase.