New <£500 Bike!
Lewis A
Posts: 767
Hi all,
My Giant has finally drifted beyond repair as I have wrecked my second pair of forks since october (this time they actually split in half) and have decided to buy a new bike rather than spending £40 on a new pair that will break just like the others. I now need a new bike. The price range i am looking at is sub-£500 bikes, for this money i would like at least hydraulic discs and a half decent frame worth upgrading over its life span. the budget depends on prices i get for ebay auctions. £500 is if i do well to be honest.
I have so far found 3 bikes that i am interested in.
Sunn Seasons S1
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mode ... elID=58992
Sunn Seasons S2
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mode ... elID=58991
Sunn Travis
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mode ... elID=58984
Obviously the S1 is the ideal bike at the moment but the price may not be achievable. the S2 is looking most likely currently and the travis is incase all else fails.
There are obviously weak points in all of the bikes specs ( S1 front derralieur, S2 front mech, brakes etc) but some parts may be upgradeable in the future. is there really much difference in quality between the seasons?
Please do help by giving suggestions and telling me where bikes go wrong.
Thanks in advance, Lewis
My Giant has finally drifted beyond repair as I have wrecked my second pair of forks since october (this time they actually split in half) and have decided to buy a new bike rather than spending £40 on a new pair that will break just like the others. I now need a new bike. The price range i am looking at is sub-£500 bikes, for this money i would like at least hydraulic discs and a half decent frame worth upgrading over its life span. the budget depends on prices i get for ebay auctions. £500 is if i do well to be honest.
I have so far found 3 bikes that i am interested in.
Sunn Seasons S1
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mode ... elID=58992
Sunn Seasons S2
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mode ... elID=58991
Sunn Travis
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mode ... elID=58984
Obviously the S1 is the ideal bike at the moment but the price may not be achievable. the S2 is looking most likely currently and the travis is incase all else fails.
There are obviously weak points in all of the bikes specs ( S1 front derralieur, S2 front mech, brakes etc) but some parts may be upgradeable in the future. is there really much difference in quality between the seasons?
Please do help by giving suggestions and telling me where bikes go wrong.
Thanks in advance, Lewis
Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.
0
Comments
-
Carrera Kraken? http://www.halfords.com/webapp/wcs/stor ... 65499#dtab
Better brakes, similar drivetrain and £150 left for upgrades......such as the Fork which isn't quite as good.
SimonCurrently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0 -
Fury if gets reduced, Kraken or Rockrider 8.1.0
-
The Beginner wrote:Carrera Kraken? http://www.halfords.com/webapp/wcs/stor ... 65499#dtab
Better brakes, similar drivetrain and £150 left for upgrades......such as the Fork which isn't quite as good.
Simon
Thanks ill take a look!Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
6 hours to the nearest decathlon store in glasgow may be a problem! are the bikes i had down any good?Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0
-
Not too bad: but mail order means you can't try anyway.0
-
They are good, but if you wait for a Carrera Fury when it's next reduced, its better value for money.
SimonCurrently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0 -
supersonic wrote:Not too bad: but mail order means you can't try anyway.
I tried a travis the other day at a skills course ( my village has a bike rental placey) after skills we went for a 4 mile ride and i was quite impressed, the front shifting wasnt very good and the fork was to tightly sprung but if i had air forks it wouldnt matter.Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
fury doesnt come in 16" and i need (want) a bike soon! how about a vengence or vulcan?Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0
-
Have you tried the Fury in 18?
The Vulcan and Vengeance are ok, but if you have 500 quid I would spend it.0 -
supersonic wrote:Have you tried the Fury in 18?
The Vulcan and Vengeance are ok, but if you have 500 quid I would spend it.Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
What about the VooDoo Hoodoo?
http://www.halfords.com/webapp/wcs/stor ... 65499#dtab
EDIT: 100 pounds over your budget but worth a look at anyway - Genesis Core 10?
http://www.irvinecycles.co.uk/acatalog/genesismtb.html0 -
y0.o! wrote:What about the VooDoo Hoodoo?
http://www.halfords.com/webapp/wcs/stor ... 65499#dtab
EDIT: 100 pounds over your budget but worth a look at anyway - Genesis Core 10?
http://www.irvinecycles.co.uk/acatalog/genesismtb.html
or i could get a full suss with better forks and drivetrain for the same price and weight?
http://www.paulscycles.co.uk/products.p ... 1b0s1p1748
my lbs stocks the genesis though it is too pricey yukon good?
or a ramones, heavy but upgradable
http://www.merlincycles.co.uk/Bike+Shop ... CM5102.htmCube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
£500 for that Yukon spec looks pretty good value for money. Bit heavy but no doubt you'd be able to knock a few pounds off if that proved to be a problem. Depends what sort of bike you want really doesn't it,0
-
yeah but ill settle for anything thats xc/trail or am no preference over hardtail/full-suss but the yukon seems to have the best spec, be a similar price, and be a full suss, which isn't THAT heavy either. i think ive made my mind up that ill get the yukon if i can afford it.Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0
-
It weighs nigh on 35lbs with pedals. 7lbs more than some 500 quid hardtails.0
-
supersonic wrote:It weighs nigh on 35lbs with pedals. 7lbs more than some 500 quid hardtails.
yeah but the forks amd drivetrain are better than most and its a full-suss its also lighter than my current bike. it also seems like a solid frame to upgrade.Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
Lewis A wrote:supersonic wrote:It weighs nigh on 35lbs with pedals. 7lbs more than some 500 quid hardtails.
yeah but the forks amd drivetrain are better than most and its a full-suss its also lighter than my current bike. it also seems like a solid frame to upgrade.
What enjoyment do you get out a drivetrain? Very little. Just buying better components doesn't necessarily make much difference to how suitable and enjoyable a bike is. Getting the best value for money at price point X likewise.
I don't see how you can buy a bike if you don't even have a preference over HT or FS since that difference is significant. A HT at the same price would be a very difference ride. Some people are more bothered by weight that others, typically XC riders who race. Some people are not bothered and benefit from the FS experience. Both valid points of view but you need to decide what you want out of the bike.
If you don't care how the bike rides at all, then you might as well go out and buy anything.0 -
NozzaC wrote:Lewis A wrote:supersonic wrote:It weighs nigh on 35lbs with pedals. 7lbs more than some 500 quid hardtails.
yeah but the forks amd drivetrain are better than most and its a full-suss its also lighter than my current bike. it also seems like a solid frame to upgrade.
What enjoyment do you get out a drivetrain? Very little. Just buying better components doesn't necessarily make much difference to how suitable and enjoyable a bike is. Getting the best value for money at price point X likewise.
I don't see how you can buy a bike if you don't even have a preference over HT or FS since that difference is significant. A HT at the same price would be a very difference ride. Some people are more bothered by weight that others, typically XC riders who race. Some people are not bothered and benefit from the FS experience. Both valid points of view but you need to decide what you want out of the bike.
If you don't care how the bike rides at all, then you might as well go out and buy anything.
yes but i am looking at slowly upgrading the bike. for now im not bothered to much about weight. it is still better to have a better drivetrain isn't it? i have no preference over ht or fs as i haven't ridden a fs since my 24" giant many years ago. this is only a bike i could go for if i have enough money i might also go for this if money is shorter:
http://www.paulscycles.co.uk/products.p ... 1b4s2p2287Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
NozzaC wrote:Lewis A wrote:supersonic wrote:It weighs nigh on 35lbs with pedals. 7lbs more than some 500 quid hardtails.
yeah but the forks amd drivetrain are better than most and its a full-suss its also lighter than my current bike. it also seems like a solid frame to upgrade.
What enjoyment do you get out a drivetrain? Very little. Just buying better components doesn't necessarily make much difference to how suitable and enjoyable a bike is. Getting the best value for money at price point X likewise.
I don't see how you can buy a bike if you don't even have a preference over HT or FS since that difference is significant. A HT at the same price would be a very difference ride. Some people are more bothered by weight that others, typically XC riders who race. Some people are not bothered and benefit from the FS experience. Both valid points of view but you need to decide what you want out of the bike.
If you don't care how the bike rides at all, then you might as well go out and buy anything.
yes but i am looking at slowly upgrading the bike. for now im not bothered to much about weight. it is still better to have a better drivetrain isn't it? i have no preference over ht or fs as i haven't ridden a fs since my 24" giant many years ago. this is only a bike i could go for if i have enough money i might also go for this if money is shorter:
http://www.paulscycles.co.uk/products.p ... 1b4s2p2287Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
Drivetrain is always last on my considerations, unless is a 7 speed freewheel.
Both Giant's are excellent value, but is a big difference in weight, and you'll feel it.
Also look at this for a lightweight XC bike:
http://www.paulscycles.co.uk/products.p ... Suspension0 -
is the fork on the cannondale any good? how much does it actually weigh? i realy do like the look of the yukon. what is the culprit for the weight on the yukon? im not to bothered about weight but if im going to upgrade the bike later i would target parts that could be lighter. are there any other bikes around i could look at? im guessing a self build isn't realy possible when price is such an issue.Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0
-
The Cannodale is about 28lbs, and the fork is good.
The weight of the Yukon is in the frame.0 -
supersonic wrote:The Cannodale is about 28lbs, and the fork is good.
The weight of the Yukon is in the frame.
so no matter how much i upgrade the bike will still be reasonably heavy? is the frame on the giant actually worth upgrading despite being heavy? i was wondering if any of these bikes would take a bigger fork? just wondering. though if i wanted more travel surely the ramones or hoodoo would be better? the ramones looks like a nice (but heavy) bike. I'm guessing that would be sortable though as higher models aren't as heavy but have the same frame (excluding the crmo?) does anybody recommend it? it would be nice to have a bike that would let me progress into more adventurous riding (really enjoyed the balblair black trail). thanks for the feedback so far it has been really useful. i just read the description of the sunn (which i have ruled out) and it said it was an am bike! what rubbish!Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
The Yukon fx1 is an great bike for the money, as already mentioned it is a bit heavy at 14.5kg or so, but having ridden one i would say that you don't notice it that much.
Components are decent and it's riding position is good, quite stable going downhill as well.
Only think I don't like about them is that the seat post won't drop that far.0 -
97th choice wrote:The Yukon fx1 is an great bike for the money, as already mentioned it is a bit heavy at 14.5kg or so, but having ridden one i would say that you don't notice it that much.
Components are decent and it's riding position is good, quite stable going downhill as well.
Only think I don't like about them is that the seat post won't drop that far.
so a good bike? im just waiting for someones opinion on the ramones before i make a decisionCube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0 -
have just been offered a 2012 cube anolog (not yet released) for £550 at the end of august, i imagine that the spec is much the same as 2011, any good?Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0
-
No 2011 analog on the official webby, so hard to say!
Merlin have excellent prices of Merida Matts right now £395 for the Pro is very good value.
http://www.merlincycles.co.uk/Bike+Shop ... S-PROD.htm
SimonCurrently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0 -
only 18" to big! i realy do want some advice on the ramones 3!Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0
-
What do you actually want from the bike? It is a heavy, hard hitting machine.
Previously it sounded like you wanted more of an XC/trail machine.0 -
earlier i didnt think an am bike was available at this price the ramones would probably suit my kind of riding best. other riders in the area have things like evil sovereigns and the like. i do want to venture into some more aggressive riding. but if the ramones isn't a good bike ill make do for something like the cannondale or cube. ive decided the yukon is a bit heavy for a xc bike. the ramones is more of a respectable weight as its a hardcore ht and if the weight proved a problem i could always invest more money later (would probably be by the new year). im hoping to go to more trail centres like laggan and kyle of sutherland. is it any good?Cube Analog 2012 with various upgrades.0