Contadors attack...

garrynolan
garrynolan Posts: 560
edited July 2010 in The bottom bracket
...was not like he said. When Schleck attacked he was followed by (I think) Vinokourov then Contador and the rest. As Schleck had his problem Vino sat down and passed him slowly. Contador immediately attacked hard. Saying he didn't see what happened to Schleck was complete rubbish! Did he think Schleck just stopped for a rest? Vino saw it and slowed and he was trying to follow Schleck. Contador should just have apologised. Any thoughts?
Not putting this in Procycling forum as they get a bit overexcited about this type of thing :) .
Visit Ireland - all of it! Cycle in Dublin and know fear!!
exercise.png

Comments

  • Percy Vera
    Percy Vera Posts: 1,103
    There is already a thread or two on this
  • redddraggon
    redddraggon Posts: 10,862
    Percy Vera wrote:
    There is already a thread or two on this

    +loads
    I like bikes...

    Twitter
    Flickr
  • Buckled_Rims
    Buckled_Rims Posts: 1,648
    Again, you say Contador saw this and he saw that, yet you still don't provide the proof. it's been days since the incident yet nobody has provided any evidence Contador saw the chain off.

    The reason is simple. Study the Hi-Def TV.

    1. Vino was directly behind Schleck blocking a direct view of Schleck.
    2. Contador is shown to have been looking away when Schleck first had a problem.
    3. Contadors eyeline is 20mtres behind and some 3 metres below Schlecks wheel (this was on a steep mountain).
    4. Schleck is still pedaling when Contador arrives at his rear wheel.
    5. Contadore overtakes on the left - The chain is on the other side of the bike.
    6. Contador is seen clearly to keep looking ahead as he passes Schleck.
    7. Contador is told about 30 seconds later Schleck has a mechanical and is clearly seen looking behind

    This is all evidence in Contadors favour, where is yours against?

    PS. I'm not even a Contador fan :shock:
    CAAD9
    Kona Jake the Snake
    Merlin Malt 4
  • softlad
    softlad Posts: 3,513
    zzzzzzzzzzz
  • fast as fupp
    fast as fupp Posts: 2,277
    Again, you say Contador saw this and he saw that, yet you still don't provide the proof. it's been days since the incident yet nobody has provided any evidence Contador saw the chain off.

    The reason is simple. Study the Hi-Def TV.

    1. Vino was directly behind Schleck blocking a direct view of Schleck.
    2. Contador is shown to have been looking away when Schleck first had a problem.
    3. Contadors eyeline is 20mtres behind and some 3 metres below Schlecks wheel (this was on a steep mountain).
    4. Schleck is still pedaling when Contador arrives at his rear wheel.
    5. Contadore overtakes on the left - The chain is on the other side of the bike.
    6. Contador is seen clearly to keep looking ahead as he passes Schleck.
    7. Contador is told about 30 seconds later Schleck has a mechanical and is clearly seen looking behind

    This is all evidence in Contadors favour, where is yours against?

    PS. I'm not even a Contador fan :shock:


    and he had his eyes closed, his fingers in his ears and was going naa-naa-naa.
    'dont forget lads, one evertonian is worth twenty kopites'
  • Buckled_Rims
    Buckled_Rims Posts: 1,648

    and he had his eyes closed, his fingers in his ears and was going naa-naa-naa.

    Strangely enough I've started to do this on the subject :wink:
    CAAD9
    Kona Jake the Snake
    Merlin Malt 4
  • AndyD2574
    AndyD2574 Posts: 1,034
    Contodor won the tour by taking advantage of a mistake so in my eyes he is an idiot!

    He denies he know what was happening which is a lie!
    Specialized S Works Venge
    Argon18 E114
    Specialized Langster Single Speed
    Scott Spark Expert 29'er
    GT Avalanche
    http://www.glasgowgreencycleclub.co.uk
  • northernneil
    northernneil Posts: 1,549
    AndyD2574 wrote:
    Contodor won the tour by taking advantage of a mistake so in my eyes he is an idiot!

    He denies he know what was happening which is a lie!

    like the mistake Andy made by handing contador 41 seconds on the prologue ?
  • freehub
    freehub Posts: 4,257
    Did Contador win? Who won?
  • Chip \'oyler
    Chip \'oyler Posts: 2,323
    AndyD2574 wrote:
    Contodor won the tour by taking advantage of a mistake so in my eyes he is an idiot!

    He denies he know what was happening which is a lie!

    It's competitive sport - get over it
    Expertly coached by http://www.vitessecyclecoaching.co.uk/

    http://vineristi.wordpress.com - the blog for Viner owners and lovers!
  • martinwitnam
    martinwitnam Posts: 439
    That the whole thing. It's competitive. If an F1 drivers gearboxblows do the other drivers stop to wait for him to get it changed?
    I think that the whole peleton should slow down enough to let the Lanterne Rouge win each day.
    Sorry I'm really not trolling, Just having a bit of a laugh!

    Can we fix it?
    Yes we can!
  • softlad
    softlad Posts: 3,513
    freehub wrote:
    Did Contador win? Who won?

    you are on the internet, and you are asking who won..???
  • AndyD2574
    AndyD2574 Posts: 1,034
    AndyD2574 wrote:
    Contodor won the tour by taking advantage of a mistake so in my eyes he is an idiot!

    He denies he know what was happening which is a lie!

    It's competitive sport - get over it

    I just dont like him so looking for a reason to slag him!! :D
    Specialized S Works Venge
    Argon18 E114
    Specialized Langster Single Speed
    Scott Spark Expert 29'er
    GT Avalanche
    http://www.glasgowgreencycleclub.co.uk