Helmets
bails87
Posts: 12,998
Comments
-
Blatant troll, not really worth it.0
-
Don't we have enough arguments on here for you? Now you're sending us to other forums to argue there?
We can start another argument on here if you like.... DDD will be along soon, he's got a creative argument streak.
I think anyone who rides clipless is an eejit.
How's that?
:P0 -
How about how ludicrous SPD sandals are?0
-
0
-
Holy Crap!
MTB poster alert!!
Quick DETOX! DEEEEETOX!!!
Where's that bloody blue anti-sceptic stuff you get down chemical bogs....?
(I am NEVER posting in that forum... :P )Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
2011 Trek Madone 4.5
2012 Felt F65X
Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter0 -
lost_in_thought wrote:
We can start another argument on here if you like.... DDD will be along soon, he's got a creative argument streak.
:P
:x
I'll have you know that I to have the exact mailout the OP in the linked thread is refering to and just this morning thought exactly the same thing; that she isn't wearing a helmet. While it isn't a legal requirement to wear a helmet the advert itself was promoting style and fashion primarily over safety.
You could argue that this particular mailout magazine is a key indicator of Evans shift from faux-local and faux-friendly bike shop to a more cycling-fashion-statement store. I would go as far as to say it has become even more a parody of itself. It is generally, there are exceptions, neither a decent or friendly local bike shop or is it a store, which pioneers cycling fashion, like Condor or Rapha.
But no LiT, I won't bite.
Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:lost_in_thought wrote:
We can start another argument on here if you like.... DDD will be along soon, he's got a creative argument streak.
:P
:x
I'll have you know that I to have the exact mailout the OP in the linked thread is refering to and just this morning thought exactly the same thing, that she isn't wearing a helmet and while it isn't a legal requirement to wear a helmet the advert itself was promoting style and fashion primarily of safety.
You could argue that this particular mailout magazine, is a key indicator of Evans shift from faux-local and friendly bike shop to a more cycling-fashion-statement store. I would go as far as to say it has become even more a parody of itself. It is generally, there are exceptions, neither a decent local bike shop or is it a store, which pioneers cycling fashion, like Condor or Rapha.
But no LiT, I won't bite.
Oh, I think you're already in the net.
Evans? Friendly? :P0 -
lost_in_thought wrote:
Evans? Friendly? :P
It's a faux-friendly approach, like the staff have training days in "upselling with a smile".Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:You could argue that this particular mailout magazine is a key indicator of Evans shift from faux-local and faux-friendly bike shop to a more cycling-fashion-statement store. .
Not hard to argue when there's a large part of the magazine called "Cycling Chic" complete with angst ridden fixie riders0 -
bails87 wrote:DonDaddyD wrote:You could argue that this particular mailout magazine is a key indicator of Evans shift from faux-local and faux-friendly bike shop to a more cycling-fashion-statement store. .
Not hard to argue when there's a large part of the magazine called "Cycling Chic" complete with angst ridden fixie riders
Yes, what annoys me is that those same fakengers all despertate for that "fixie look" would look and deem me "all gear and no idea". F*cking skinny jean wearing f*ck f*cks.
I've been dragged into this now haven't I?
Damn.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:I've been dragged into this now haven't I?0
-
Mickey Eye wrote:DonDaddyD wrote:I've been dragged into this now haven't I?
0 -
DonDaddyD wrote:lost_in_thought wrote:
Evans? Friendly? :P
It's a faux-friendly approach, like the staff have training days in "upselling with a smile".BMC TM01 - FCN 0
Look 695 (Geared) - FCN 1
Bowman Palace:R - FCN 1
Cannondale CAAD 9 - FCN 2
Premier (CX) - FCN 6
Premier (fixed/SS) - FCN30 -
Let me guess, you work for Evans don't you?
Enlighten me, what training do they have?Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
used to.
we had product training, at no point were we taught to up sell. and im not saying that to defend them its the truth.BMC TM01 - FCN 0
Look 695 (Geared) - FCN 1
Bowman Palace:R - FCN 1
Cannondale CAAD 9 - FCN 2
Premier (CX) - FCN 6
Premier (fixed/SS) - FCN30 -
Nothing wrong with up-selling.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
i agree there is nothing wrong with upselling, its actually a skill if you can do it without people realising you are upselling. but the way we were taught to sell products to customers at evans was to ask questions, get the requirements of the customer, and then target the selling that way. normally someone who is buying a bike has a budget and that is where you tailor your products around.
i found upselling very easy by just being passionate and explaining benefits and drawbacks to different bikes, gear systems, and ability of equipment.BMC TM01 - FCN 0
Look 695 (Geared) - FCN 1
Bowman Palace:R - FCN 1
Cannondale CAAD 9 - FCN 2
Premier (CX) - FCN 6
Premier (fixed/SS) - FCN30 -
spasypaddy wrote:normally someone who is buying a bike has a budget and that is where you tailor your products around.Food Chain number = 4
A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game0 -
Reminds me of a phrase - Hook, Line, Sinker and copy of Angling Times...0
-
bails87 wrote:Does anyone want to address this?
It's in the MTB forum. You could argue that there's some point in wearing a helmet on an MTB, I'm certainly in no position to argue either way, though the poster seems to have an inflated idea of the value of helmets, if his/her comment about buses is anything to go by!!
The catalogue picture shows someone choosing not to wear one.. that's a perfectly sensible, legal choice.... don't see the issue, there, except that the poster appears to be misinformed... more fool them.
Cheers,
W.0