105 Rear Derailleur & Tiagra Shifters

gb155
Posts: 2,048
As above, would a 105 Rear Derailleur & Tiagra Shifters work together ?
On a Mission to lose 20 stone..Get My Life Back
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.
0
Comments
-
They do on my bike
FWIW generally if you mix the same speed (ie 9speed, 10 speed etc) shifters with derailleur and use the same brand (ie shimano with shimano or campagnolo with campagnolo) it will work fine.
You can usually mix 10 speed shifters with 9 speed deraileurs also, but you have to be a bit more carefull with chain widths etc0 -
Great thanks, I assume it will make shifting smoother than the rear Tiagra thats on my bike now ?On a Mission to lose 20 stone..Get My Life Back
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.0 -
will3 wrote:gb155 wrote:Great thanks, I assume it will make shifting smoother than the rear Tiagra thats on my bike now ?
Yeah since new, around 2500 miles nowOn a Mission to lose 20 stone..Get My Life Back
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.0 -
gb155 wrote:
Was it always bad or has it got worse:? If you've been cross chaining a lot, it's possible that your jockey wheels have some wear (although 2500 would be a bit quick). Also possible it just needs a good clean and slight tweak of the adjusters.0 -
Shifting in general is good, however when I stand up and put the power down it gets pretty rough, but to be fair its always been like that, I assumed that 105's are smoother when you put the hammer down ?On a Mission to lose 20 stone..Get My Life Back
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.0 -
Shifting to a harder gear can also be lazy if your cables are sticking due to dirt/corrosion etc.
Shifting under power is always a bit worse IME, not to mention not terribly good for the drivetrain.0 -
May not be a problem with the derailleur, more likely cables, chain or cassette as above. A Tiagra should work fine. Also, shifting under full power is probably always going to be rough.
Isn't 105 10 speed?0 -
All shimano derailleurs should play happily with all shimano levers, regardless of how many speeds they support.0
-
Are the cassette, chain and deraillure nice and clean GB155? After a week of commuting the running gear needs a degrease and lube, slip the cable out and clean and lube that too just like Will3 has pointed out.
I've never had 105 but I doubt that there will be a significant difference, especially if your changing gear under force.
I would think that a 10sp 105 would work on a 9 speed shifter with the limiter screws set correctly._________________________________________________
Pinarello Dogma 2 (ex Team SKY) 2012
Cube Agree GTC Ultegra 2012
Giant Defy 105 20090 -
I have a cast iron solution for you:
1) Get yourself an old 5speed bike (with an old pre uniglide freewheel)
2) Ride this for a month being sure to do lots of gear changes under power
3) Get back on your Hyperglide cassette equiped bike - the gear changes will seem awesome!0 -
Thanks for the advice guys, new shiney bits are always welcome, so maybe a 105 and a pinch of everyones advice should be the order of the dayOn a Mission to lose 20 stone..Get My Life Back
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.0 -
-
Aidy wrote:
Um, well thinking about it that's for the front derailleur, I think. :oops:0 -
will3 wrote:gb155 wrote:Thanks for the advice guys, new shiney bits are always welcome, so maybe a 105 and a pinch of everyones advice should be the order of the day
Sounds good - but do let us know if it actually makes a difference!
Will do
Considering a full 105 upgrade but dont have the funds at the moment, need to re-spray my MTB first, but thats another topicOn a Mission to lose 20 stone..Get My Life Back
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.0 -
Might just be frame flex when you're hammering it. I've heard of it happening especially with bigger lads. And i've heard about your sprinting power!0
-
prawny wrote:Might just be frame flex when you're hammering it. I've heard of it happening especially with bigger lads. And i've heard about your sprinting power!
Yeah thats a fair point and A great sprinter am IOn a Mission to lose 20 stone..Get My Life Back
December 2007 - 39 Stone 05 Lbs
July 2011 - 13 Stone 12 Lbs - Cycled 17851 Miles
http://39stonecyclist.com
Now the hard work starts.0 -
Unless the Tiagra is very worn and needs replacing for whatever reason there really isn't enough of a performance difference between it and 105 to justify the effort and expense of the upgrade.0
-
biondino wrote:Unless the Tiagra is very worn and needs replacing for whatever reason there really isn't enough of a performance difference between it and 105 to justify the effort and expense of the upgrade.
+1
May as well go for Ultegra or Force, if the frame is worth the investmentCannondale Supersix / CAAD9 / Boardman 9.0 / Benotto 30000 -
Yeah, that's my understanding.
Your moving from 3 to 5 on a 10 point scale and the difference will be negligible.
We all like bling, but save up for some Ultegra - that'll be like 3 to 10 ish.
Pat..."Campagnolo has soul, Shimano has ruthless efficiency and SRAM has yet to acquire mystique. Differentiating between them is a matter of taste"0 -
105 is rubbish.0