Highrollers v Big earl
sailor74
Posts: 48
anyone compared the two? Wondered how much faster rolling the big earl is, and whether there is a noticeable reduction in grip.
for hard trail riding and freeride duties.
for hard trail riding and freeride duties.
0
Comments
-
-
I don't really agree but it's a bit of a pointless comparison unless you say which compound/size HR you are talking about.
Personally I really rate the Big Earl's and prefer them to HRs - they are fairly similar but seem to wear less quickly and roll better than either super tacky or the 60a High Rollers in 2.35.
I am using the 2.5 wet Big Earls btw.0 -
thanks for that, I am running 60a compound HR 2.35. I thought the big earls would roll quicker just wanted to know how much grip i would be loosing.
Am thinking of going 2.5 front and 2.35 rear both wets, any thoughts?0 -
I think you will find the grip fine - I would say they roll a bit faster but it might not make a massive difference.0
-
grumsta wrote:I don't really agree but it's a bit of a pointless comparison unless you say which compound/size HR you are talking about.
Personally I really rate the Big Earl's and prefer them to HRs - they are fairly similar but seem to wear less quickly and roll better than either super tacky or the 60a High Rollers in 2.35.
I am using the 2.5 wet Big Earls btw.0 -
42a supertacky front and 60a rear and the big earls were like tractor tyres in comparison.
I had the same combo and kind of found the opposite. I prefer something a bit faster rolling than HRs or Big Earls on the back though.
I liked my High Rollers for grip but they were draggy as hell and didn't last long.0