Columbia : Like em or not?
Remember when Cuddly Bob took over High Horse and how people tended to be very positive about the squad and constantly sing their praises.
I get the impression that's died off a bit and while they're a formidible winning machine they don't seem to capture the imagination like some other teams.
Is that just my perception? I've never been a fan of the team or their "ethics" but it seems like there is less talk in general about them.
I get the impression that's died off a bit and while they're a formidible winning machine they don't seem to capture the imagination like some other teams.
Is that just my perception? I've never been a fan of the team or their "ethics" but it seems like there is less talk in general about them.
Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
0
Posts
I suppose sometimes people like cheering on the underdogs and as they are now clearly the top dog, human nature likes to knock people off the top and help up those that are struggling.
either that or Bob Stapleton's two faced scorpio persona has come out... (for all you simpson fans out there)
Bob Stapleton
Scorpio
+1 although there are some teams that just rub me up the wrong way.
Strava is not Zen.
* It's a word. Look it up. It's in the dictionary next to winningest.
As do I but Columbia seemed to inspire a following a couple of years ago which seems to have disappeared...
Here in the States the only people that like the New York Yankees are people from
New York and myself. It's sort of an odd phenomena that the teams that are the biggest winners are disliked the most.
I didn't like High Horse / Columbia when they won sod all. I don't like them now.
Does that give you a headache?
...despite Garmin having Wiggo 'n all that, you can't really love 'em with those orange and pale blue cheques that shouldn't be seen outside a golf club... ...I mean, honestly!
Not quite following you????? :? :? :?
Then again I don't understand lots of things.
You said people don't like the Yankee's because they win a lot. As the discussion was actually about Columbia, you were clearly trying to say people dislike Columbia because they win a lot.
So I didn't like them when they won nothing and don't like them now.
You're right, that does give me a headache.
Brits don't seem to like a winner :?
They're the opposite to Ivan - you liked him when he was winning a lot, now he's winning nothing and you still like him...
Unlike someone on Columbia, Ivan has won a race this year.
Kim's actually won something since being at Cuddly Bob's squad.
Dodge hasn't.
Columbia, OTOH, are clinically efficient.
Would we feel the same way about them if their wins were fewer? In other words, if the Gorgeous Cav the Chav was elsewhere?
Which explains why Chris Hoy, Bobby Moore, Roger Bannister, Jonathan Edwards, Edmund Hilary etc, etc are such figures of hate.
Sorry, I don't mean to be rude but I just don't get the argument that Brits don't like a winner when there are so many examples to the contrary.
I would argue that we're too harsh on our champions when they are perceived to fail e.g. Paula Radcliffe
I'm also impressed at the way they rejected the traditional business plan of getting a GC rider and just concentrated on winning as much as possible, regardless of the race.
I'm also starting to like their kit, which is worrying.
(And to defend IainF, he's always hated them, winning or not, though I've never understoood why)
Abysmal
Better
Seek help immediately!