Full suss or hardtail

joshposh
joshposh Posts: 673
edited September 2009 in MTB buying advice
Ok i know this is going to proibably spark controversy but i would ideally like an honest answer from people who know what their talking about. I am a youth racer and mainly do road racing and time trialling. This year however i have done a bit of mountain biking and have won a few races due to my fitness rather than technical ability. My technical ability is a bit limited but i can just about cope with most things. I have been riding a hardtail for most of the season but i have also ridden a full suss (namely a specialized epic expert 2008 and a stumjumper comp 2008, both heavily upgraded!) Now for next season i have a choice of either an aluminium epic expert with xtr, sram x0 and rockshox sid team forks or an equivalent hardtail (must be a specialized as im sponsored by them). I am planning on doing the youth national champs next year and have noticed that most people ride hardtails. Should i opt for a full suss or a hardtail? Any advice would be great!

Comments

  • well what does everyone else race on? FS or HT?
  • Well mostly hardtails but the odd full suss crops up sometimes. I expect its cause full suss bikes cost more!
  • Or because they're not needed :wink:
  • Could be whats your opinion?
  • I doubt you can go wrong if you're being given a bike.... why not ask specialized what they'd offer you as a HT first, and ask which they think you should have?
  • I could do that except i dont really have much contact with them (its mainly my team boss) so i was hoping for some opinions on here first.
  • Georgeb
    Georgeb Posts: 315
    It seems that alot of xc racers ride ht, so assume thats the best choice. Maybe because of lighter weight, and better pedaling effeciency?(although there probably not much difference)
  • A HT will pretty much always be lighter and more efficient. However a FS will give more traction going up so therefore transfer more of your power to the ground and will be better downhill.

    TBH if I wanted a racebike I'd go for a HT. But you're sponsored and therefore bloody fit! That means you could probably handle the extra weight of a full sus and you would benefit from the extra security it gives you on the techy sections.

    Swings and roundabouts.......

    EDIT: I don't know if you can get any bike you want from Specialized but basically for a FS go for the highest spec Epic you can get your hands on, and for a HT the highest spec Stumpjumper.
  • nfrang
    nfrang Posts: 250
    I'm not a racer so this probably doesn't qualify as advice :wink:

    But being sponsored you must get time to train on different bikes and see which you feel suits your style the best? I would guess as well the type of racing which i assume is xc will be a big factor in that decision.

    The general consensus on bikeradar to this question(daily) is it's best to cut ya teeth on a hardtail.

    Major respect for getting sponsored and doing so well from the get go 8) 8) 8)
  • passout
    passout Posts: 4,425
    In reality the course you are riding should determine the choice - can you get both?

    A FS bike offers greater traction (especially on steep climbs/technical) and can mean less fatigue over longer rougher XC courses. They can also mean less punctures and/or slightly faster descending depending on riding style, skill levels but mostly the course.

    Hardtails are lighter and I think that standing on the pedals when climbing/sprinting is more effective on a HT. HTs are popular because of weight, cost and the fact that many XC racers are roadies at heart :D

    If we are talking short travel FS (80-100mm) then I think tyre choice is going to be a more important decision to be honest.

    I'd go for FS if I could only get one.
    'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.
  • joshposh wrote:
    I have been riding a hardtail for most of the season but i have also ridden a full suss (namely a specialized epic expert 2008 and a stumjumper comp 2008, both heavily upgraded!)

    You probably have more experience than most of us when it comes to racing these bikes then :D Which did you prefer?
  • in the words of Fernando Alonso "which is faster?"

    sounds like it's possible that a FS would be faster for you as you admit you have technical shortcomings.

    *however* once you get better, you'll be faster on a HT in most XC race conditions
    Everything in moderation ... except beer
    Beer in moderation ... is a waste of beer

    If riding an XC race bike is like touching the trail,
    then riding a rigid singlespeed is like licking it
    ... or being punched by it, depending on the day