what steel hardtail frame?

Anonymous
Anonymous Posts: 79,666
edited September 2009 in MTB buying advice
ive not been using my oldest stumpjumper for a while now have decided i might make a transfer of all of my bits onto a newer frame. i have a stumpjumper and an enduro so dont need another fs bike so im toying with the idea of a steel hardtail.

now i know i dont really like hardtails but ive recently been hankering after one as there are some real nice ones about at the mo.

my "spare" stumpy is pretty decent spec(reba uturn poploc adjust, dt swis/alex wheels, x9 mech and shifters, xt brakes, racefacr evolv xc cranks, thomson post, fsa k force carbon bars) and i think the only things i will have to worry about changig is the seat post as i have the adapters for my front mech and a spare seat collar (im expecting whatever i get to require a 27.2 post)

so bearing in mind my fork is 115mm travel, im certain i want a steel bike but i want one which has a bit of flex, im not after a rock solid harsh ride (like my p7 was!!) what can you recommend?

im thinking about:
on one 456 summer season, running it with my fork should still make it fairly slack and that strikes me as a good thing.

kinesis decade versa cause it looks good and again, will suit all of my kit

budget is under 500 quid
«1345

Comments

  • btw... £500 gets you a handjob :lol:
    http://www.tredz.co.uk/.Cove-Handjob-XC ... e_9021.htm bloooooooody lovely, possibly some of the best steel frames come form cove.
  • clanton
    clanton Posts: 1,289
    I admit to being biased - but I'd go for the Cotic Soul.
  • bomberesque
    bomberesque Posts: 1,701
    would say Evil Sovereign, but you'll not get one for 500 I don't think as the distributors "have to make a profit" :roll:

    456 is a sound choice and good value but 500 will get you some fairly exotic steel (like the cove as Benj says)

    Other choices;
    Singular. they have a 26" on the way I believe
    Curtis (although again 500 might be light for one)
    Dialled Prince Albert
    Rock Lobster 853

    I looked at all of these (except the Singular) 2 years ago and went with the Evil in the end. Top frame and I got a good price because I got it from Canada (pounds for dollars....)
    Everything in moderation ... except beer
    Beer in moderation ... is a waste of beer

    If riding an XC race bike is like touching the trail,
    then riding a rigid singlespeed is like licking it
    ... or being punched by it, depending on the day
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    What sort of riding will you be doing Sheeps? Some of the frames mentioned are lightweight and flexy numbers, others belong more in the skatepark lol.
  • joshtp
    joshtp Posts: 3,966
    Charge duster is a sound bet, should be perfect with that travel, is hugely cool and the frame can be picked up for £350. its a great Hardcore XC slayer!
    I like bikes and stuff
  • Harveytile
    Harveytile Posts: 227
    Gotta put my 2p in for the Prince Albert :shock: .

    I've ridden, thrashed, and crashed it (the last bit a lot :roll: ) but still she comes back for more.

    I think it's designed to run a 130mm fork (I run a 125mm) so not too sure what it would be like with your 125mm... Still a cracking frame. :wink:
    .
    Beep Beep Richie.
    .

    FCN +7 (Hanzo Fixed. Simple - for the commute)
    FCN +10 (Loud and proud PA)
  • bomberesque
    bomberesque Posts: 1,701
    supersonic

    I dread to ask ... which of the listed bikes above your post belong more in a skatepark?
    Everything in moderation ... except beer
    Beer in moderation ... is a waste of beer

    If riding an XC race bike is like touching the trail,
    then riding a rigid singlespeed is like licking it
    ... or being punched by it, depending on the day
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Lol, it was an exaggeration, but some are certainly built to take more than xc trails will throw at them. But given as Sheeps is a big lad a more sturdy construction may be of benefit.

    I think he needs to try some full builds out as the frames do vary quite a bit in feel.
  • bomberesque
    bomberesque Posts: 1,701
    fair point, I'd groom my heckles back then :wink:

    As for trying some full builds, it's one of the problems with a lot of the steel frame out atm though, isn't it? you can't get a try out on them because they're so often frame only, foreign or interweb orders. I had to order the Evil "off plan" so to speak and in fact did so because of its adjustable geometry (about 2" or so in the wheelbase) mahoosive mud clearanceand the plethora of adjustable forks about at the time. The burning skull on the head tube didnt hurt either :roll:
    Everything in moderation ... except beer
    Beer in moderation ... is a waste of beer

    If riding an XC race bike is like touching the trail,
    then riding a rigid singlespeed is like licking it
    ... or being punched by it, depending on the day
  • The Spiderman
    The Spiderman Posts: 5,625
    Do you really need a 456,the standard Inbred can take up to 5" forks?

    Worth mentioning but some of the lads in my local club who I rode with last week ride steel hardtails.One has a Dialled Bikes PA,2 others are on Inbreds.

    Chatting to one of the lads,he metioned he tried the Cotic Soul,but reckoned it rode like an expensive Inbread and couldn`t really justifiy the extra.,and bought the Inbred.

    On one are knocking out the 456 and Inbreds at £125 at the moment so,might be worth a try at that price,anyway.You could probably sell it on for not much less,if you don`t like it.
    2006 Giant XTC
    2010 Giant Defy Advanced
    2016 Boardman Pro 29er
    2016 Pinnacle Lithium 4
    2017 Canondale Supersix Evo
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,666
    On one are knocking out the 456 and Inbreds at £125 at the moment so,might be worth a try at that price,anyway.You could probably sell it on for not much less,if you don`t like it.

    got it in one,

    at that price im tempted to give it a go and see how i get on, if i dont like it, i wont be much out of pocket. i like the idea of a relatively slack HA as opposed to the typical 100mm fork travel bikes with fairly steep HA. and even with a short fork on there, it should still be fairly slack, i think the regular inbred would end up being too steep and twitchy for my slow lumbery style.

    sonic, it will be for general trail type use, as you say, im a big old unit so probs not really looking for a feather weight, im choosing stel as i think it will be tough and forgiving whereas im under the impression alu is tough and too stif!! my p7 was a lovely shape and fit with the front end slackness going on but the bike was harsh as fook, even with my bulk on it.

    im swaying towars the 456 summer season as it might do the trick, if i end up enjoying it then it will be worth the gamble, but if idont, im only out by the price of the frame and a new seatpost.
  • blister pus
    blister pus Posts: 5,610
    If you were in no rush Brant's got some Ragley short travel hardtails due out xmas time. Details are scant though, like they are just short travel orientated for normal people doing normal xc riding. Don't know what they're going to be made out of or owt like that.

    Silly season is a no-brainer for now tho.
  • RealMan
    RealMan Posts: 2,166
    NS surge? Although check what length fork the frame is rated for first, not sure if 115mm would be too short. Beautiful frame. And I'm sure a guy I know was descending in the Alps with his at 95mm just for a challenge..
  • RealMan wrote:
    NS surge? Although check what length fork the frame is rated for first, not sure if 115mm would be too short. Beautiful frame. And I'm sure a guy I know was descending in the Alps with his at 95mm just for a challenge..

    It takes 120-160 yeah... buts its a bit of a dog at anything under 140 I find... TBH, I don't take it off 160mm!
  • RealMan
    RealMan Posts: 2,166
    Still, that downtube.. :D:D
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Sheeps you may find the summer season even harsher - heavier plain gauge tubing.
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,666
    aah right i getcha.

    anyone know owt about the decade?
  • hoathy
    hoathy Posts: 776
    How about a Pipedream Sirrus? I haven't ever seen or ridden one, but I have a weird attraction to it, I have been quite wanting one for a while. I am worringlt close to getting one when i next have the cash!
    FInd here: http://pipedreamcycles.com/sirius_page_menu.html
    Alternatively, at the bike shed in Exeter; they have a lovely Marin Pine Mountain frame...
    - Kona Hot '96 - Marin Rift Zone '09 - Cannondale Synapse Carbon '06 - Kona Caldera '98 - Kona AA '94 - Dawes Kickback II - Cannondale BadBoy '11 - Genesis iOiD SS -
  • Cooovvveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  • blister pus
    blister pus Posts: 5,610
    heh. that Pipedream Sirius looks worth a further investigate.
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Ah, the Sirius. I remember liking that a lot when it was released.
  • joshtp
    joshtp Posts: 3,966
    HELO!,Helo! anyone hear me? any thoughts on the Duster?
    I like bikes and stuff
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,666
    that pipe dream is really good looking, you can get a merlin tig sl thingy for 200 quid too, are they any good?
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    The RL 853 is becoming a bit of a classic. Quite short top tubes, and very light - you might find it too flexy in the big sizes.
  • Sheeps.... whatever you do, test ride a built up bike before you buy the frame, just like I was going to do with a FS..

    Don't want you buying one and then 3 weeks later having a "hardtails are shite" rant :lol:
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,666
    There is only one frame is worth getting and it's the best steel frame / price is the Genesis Altitude 30, it comes with Reynolds 853 tubing, beautiful frame and £350, Charge and On-One is too heavy.
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Do you know the weights? The Cotic and RL are lighter than the Genesis...
  • John Moore
    John Moore Posts: 580
    BFe from herehttp://www.cotic.co.uk/product/BFe
    Says Weight - 5.3 lbs for the 17.5"

    Mine weights around 28lbs built up, a great bike but too good for my crap skills
  • Steve_b77
    Steve_b77 Posts: 1,680
    You really want on of these ->

    3222750813_2029b214f9_b.jpg

    Thats with the forks set at 115mm :D

    Nice springy ride all round superstar in my mind.

    My mate had a blast on it the other day and then started trawling fleabay for 2nd hand frames :lol: