Geometry and all that.

Wondering how the geometry of a frame actually affects performance, does anyone have any links to reliable info on this?
Surely with the adjustabilty of all bikes it seems the rider can be set in the optimum position on pretty much anything so why all the variation in frame shape/design and why are some designs preferable to others?
Surely with the adjustabilty of all bikes it seems the rider can be set in the optimum position on pretty much anything so why all the variation in frame shape/design and why are some designs preferable to others?
0
Posts
Geometry is a pretty all-embracing term. Wheelbase, chainstay length, front-centre distance, head tube length etc are all linked to the angles of the tube intersects - in particular seat and head - and the fork characteristics.
The "engine" (rider) could have exactly the same position between bars and saddle and pedals on bikes with enormously different "geometries"!
"Cancel my subscription to the resurrection."
Not sure that that is what "we" meant - feel, yes, but an extra long wheel base for example will affect "performance" (especially as related to handling - how quickly responds to steering input, say).
I can't think of any reason why a horizontal top tube (everything else being equal!) would or could make a bike quicker. On the contrary, a sloper being lighter and stiffer (everything else being equal again!) should transfer power more effectively and more effecirntly and thus be "quicker" for any given power input. I'm leaving aside the question of exposed seat post length for the more technically minded!
"Cancel my subscription to the resurrection."