bike weight: the numbers do not add up?

nvc
nvc Posts: 31
edited July 2008 in MTB general
hello just bought a new bike a canonndale F4 Z , though I do not have a fat wallet.
I still love a light bike .

The thing is I weigh the bike on the scale , 13.6kg

but when I put the weight of all the parts together ( from each website)

things just did not add up I got 13kg

so that is 600g more

think got worse for my old bike weigh at 12.9 ,added together at 11.5kg 1.4kg different

what went wrong? thanks a lot


Model: 2008 Cannondale F4 Weight

Bottom Bracket:  • Bottom Bracket: Shimano BB-ES25 Octalink. 350 ?
Brake Levers:  • Brake Levers: Avid Juicy 3.
Rear Brakes:  • Rear Brake: Avid Juicy 3 (160mm Rotor). 404
Front Brakes:  • Front Brake: Avid Juicy 3 (160mm Rotors). 404
Cables: cannondale 150 ?
Cassette: • Freewheel: SRAM PG-950, 11-34. 420 ?
Chain:  • Chain: Shimano HG-53. 304
Crankset:  • Chainset: Shimano FC-M442, 22/32/44. 715
Derlr (Front) • Front Derailleur: Shimano Deore. 128
Derlr (Rear) • Rear Derailleur: SRAM X-7 Long cage. 270
Fork: • Forks: Rockshox Tora 302 Solo Air 100 with lockout. 2236
Frame:  Frame: CO2 Canti/Disc Aluminium. 1600 ?
Grips: • Grips: Cannondale V-tech grips.. 100 ?
Handlebar:  vHandlebars: Cannondale C3, 20mm rise. 250 ?
Headset:  • Headset: Cannondale Headshok Si. 300 ?
Pedals:  shimano M520 380
Quick Releases: Control Tech Ti 123
Seat:  • Saddle: Cannondale All Terrain. 317.4
Seatpost:  • Seatpost: Cannondale C4, 31.6 x 350mm. 329
Shifters:  • Shifters: SRAM X-7 Triggers. 262
Stem:  • Stem: Cannondale XC3 Headshok, 31.8mm. 250 ?
Tire (Front) 650 ?
Tire (Rear): 650 ?
Tubes: ? 200 ?
Wheelset:
--Rims:  • Rims: Mach 1 Sub Zero Disc, 32 hole. 940
--Spokes:  • Spokes: DT Swiss Champion, 1.8mm. 444
--Front Hub:  • Front Hub: Shimano M475 Disc. 245
--Rear Hub:  •rear Hub: Shimano M475 Disc. 449
mi reflector, chain protector 150
total 13020.4





for my old bike





items weight status
Brand X Frame 1700 new
spinner 1500 new
WTB Rocket V Comp Saddle 204 new
push seatpost 230 new
Shimano Chains HG 93 304 new
RaceFace Chain Stay Pad Protector 50 new
lx Rear Derailleur RD-M580-SGS 311 new
Shimano Deore 9sp HG50 358 new
Atomlab G.I. CNC Seat Clamp & Bolt 18 new
Shimano Deore Brake & Shifter Combo M510 450 new
Shimano Deore F-Mech Conventional M511 128 new
Shimano XT Gear and break Cable Set 200 new
rear break 0 old
Shimano Deore V-Brake M510 365 new

front wheel 1122 new
new
Front wheel net 1122

front sarencen 750
front quick release 58 old Front wheel 1781

rear wheel rim 520 new
rear wheel spokes 260 new
Shimano XT Disc Rear M765 369 new rear wheel net 1149
rear quick release 61 new
Michelin Tyres - rear 500 new
tube speculized 150 rear wheel 1860


wheel total 3790

peddle 380 new
answer carbon headbar 125 new
stem 300 old
AheadSet STS headset 141 new
Shimano LX UN53 Bottom Bracket 300 new
shimano Crankset Deore M510 700 new


total 11554

Comments

  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    with the dale there are a few guesses in there, and oe equipment is often a little heavier than aftermarket stuff. Need to add spacers for stem, seat bolt, grease even!
  • zero303
    zero303 Posts: 1,162
    Manufacturer quoted weights are rarely correct. Truvativ bar and stem I just bought were about 10g a piece out...

    Tyres I've weighed in the past have always been heavier than quoted.
  • switchback18
    switchback18 Posts: 617
    also, weights are usually quoted for 1 frame size, so if yours is larger, it will be heavier.

    The general weight issue reminds me of old cars & horse power, they were always 'optimistic' with the figures.

    I've found that design has a much bigger effect than weight. My DMR at about 28 pounds accelerates way faster than a Yates I had that weighed 23 pounds.

    Geometry, tube profiles etc add up to a lot.
  • Stu 74
    Stu 74 Posts: 463
    Have your scales been calibrated?! Seriously as well as the other possible explanations put forward inaccurate scales could well be a factor

    Stu.
  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    so the air in the tyres? that weighs.
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,675
    a bit more i think.
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Ah... 4g.

    To be honest the weight weenies do weigh it, and glue and grease and stuff. Not sure what it actually all works out out,a few dozen g maybe.
  • SDK2007
    SDK2007 Posts: 782
    Some quick observations from me

    Inner tubes weigh more than 200g each and you have 2 of them :wink:
    Your handle bar probably weighs bit more
  • Chris`I
    Chris`I Posts: 206
    Xtreem wrote:
    Spoke nipples? :D
    Dont forget rim tape :wink:
    2010 Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Comp
    2010 Specialized Tricross Sport (commuter)
    2012 Boardman Road Team
  • BlackSpur
    BlackSpur Posts: 4,228
    To be honest it really isn't worth worrying about.
    "Melancholy is incompatible with bicycling." ~James E. Starrs
  • dav1
    dav1 Posts: 1,298
    alsopossible forany grime to add up weight, water that hasnt been removed and is lingering in a hard to reach spot. The possiblilities for an extra 500g are endless.
    Giant TCR advanced 2 (Summer/race)
    Merlin single malt fixie (Commuter/winter/training)
    Trek superfly 7 (Summer XC)
    Giant Yukon singlespeed conversion (winter MTB/Ice/snow)

    Carrera virtuoso - RIP
  • RichMTB
    RichMTB Posts: 599
    nicklouse wrote:
    so the air in the tyres? that weighs.

    According to Avogadro's Law 22.4 litres of gas at STP is one molar weight, The molar weight of air is about 29g (Nitrogen is 28g and Oxygen is 32g)

    BUT

    The air in tyres isn't STP it about three time denser (eg 45psi) so 22.4 litre of tyre air weighs about 87g or put another way every litre of air in your tyres weighs roughly 4grams :)
    Step in to my hut! - Stumpy Jumpy Pacey
  • icedmind
    icedmind Posts: 206
    u weight the star nut, bolt n top cap?
    also the cables and outers
    08 Swork Stumpy FSR with 3 brains
    "2Brains. A Singletrack Mind ", from specialized <<<suppose if the rider doesnt have one
  • Splasher
    Splasher Posts: 1,528
    ^^ Good stuff on the weight of air in tyres.

    But shouldn't that be mass, not weight. :wink: And you've neglected to consider that the bike is not being weighed in a vacuum so you have the bouyancy effect of the air around the tyre. So the actual contribution to the bikes mass is the relative density of the pressurised air compared to atmospheric pessure air, not the absolute density. :?

    As for bike weights, most published numbers are optomistic at best, lies at worst. Hang it on a well calibrated scale and that's what it weighs.

    When I added up the published weights of the parts on my bike and it came to 29 lbs, weighed it on the scales and it's 30.5 - it's an all too familiar story. But look at it this way, everyone's in the same boat so if your bikes covered in XT and your mates it covered in Deore, your's is still lighter.
    "Internet Forums - an amazing world where outright falsehoods become cyber-facts with a few witty key taps and a carefully placed emoticon."
  • nvc
    nvc Posts: 31
    thanks everyone.


    the tora 302 solo air 100mm quoted as 2236g

    I measured as 2344g after cutted off about 43 grams .there must have some really heavy air in it.
    :oops:
    I have a big and very accurate scale max out at 43999.99 g. and sometimes I weigh stuff for fun :oops: but I guess I am not going to strip down the bike this time.
  • nvc
    nvc Posts: 31
    Splasher wrote:
    ^^ Good stuff on the weight of air in tyres.

    But shouldn't that be mass, not weight. :wink: And you've neglected to consider that the bike is not being weighed in a vacuum so you have the bouyancy effect of the air around the tyre. So the actual contribution to the bikes mass is the relative density of the pressurised air compared to atmospheric pessure air, not the absolute density. :?

    As for bike weights, most published numbers are optomistic at best, lies at worst. Hang it on a well calibrated scale and that's what it weighs.

    When I added up the published weights of the parts on my bike and it came to 29 lbs, weighed it on the scales and it's 30.5 - it's an all too familiar story. But look at it this way, everyone's in the same boat so if your bikes covered in XT and your mates it covered in Deore, your's is still lighter.

    hello the air is condensed in the tyre , 4bar? 60psi? so it is heavier. wondering wether the tour de france riders pump H2 into the tyres

    seems I am not the only one did the sums. :lol:

    btw the C dale use larger headset that must weight like 100g more
  • xtreem
    xtreem Posts: 2,965
    [b]nvc[/b] wrote:
    hello the air is condensed in the tyre , 4bar? 60psi? so it is heavier. wondering wether the tour de france riders pump H2 into the tyres
    I've heard from a comentator that the bikes for Tour de France can't weight less than 6800g.
    They can make them lighter but then that's a fragile peace of metal.
  • BlackSpur
    BlackSpur Posts: 4,228
    nvc wrote:
    Splasher wrote:
    ^^ Good stuff on the weight of air in tyres.

    But shouldn't that be mass, not weight. :wink: And you've neglected to consider that the bike is not being weighed in a vacuum so you have the bouyancy effect of the air around the tyre. So the actual contribution to the bikes mass is the relative density of the pressurised air compared to atmospheric pessure air, not the absolute density. :?

    As for bike weights, most published numbers are optomistic at best, lies at worst. Hang it on a well calibrated scale and that's what it weighs.

    When I added up the published weights of the parts on my bike and it came to 29 lbs, weighed it on the scales and it's 30.5 - it's an all too familiar story. But look at it this way, everyone's in the same boat so if your bikes covered in XT and your mates it covered in Deore, your's is still lighter.

    hello the air is condensed in the tyre , 4bar? 60psi? so it is heavier. wondering wether the tour de france riders pump H2 into the tyres

    seems I am not the only one did the sums. :lol:

    btw the C dale use larger headset that must weight like 100g more

    Great idea. Ever see that film of the Hindenburg blowing up?
    "Melancholy is incompatible with bicycling." ~James E. Starrs
  • RichMTB
    RichMTB Posts: 599
    Splasher wrote:
    ^^ Good stuff on the weight of air in tyres.

    But shouldn't that be mass, not weight. :wink: And you've neglected to consider that the bike is not being weighed in a vacuum so you have the bouyancy effect of the air around the tyre. So the actual contribution to the bikes mass is the relative density of the pressurised air compared to atmospheric pessure air, not the absolute density. :?

    Splasher, you are indeed correct It should be mass of air in tyres but the bouyancy effect wouldn't change the weight (or the mass) but would possibly have a very small effect on the measured weight (depending on whether scales or a balance was used)
    Step in to my hut! - Stumpy Jumpy Pacey
  • xtremedash
    xtremedash Posts: 182
    These sort's of weights are insignificant to the great big one sat on the bike! As others have said the published weight's will be optimistic.
    If you're not living life on the edge, you're taking up too much room!
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,667
    who cares? :roll:
  • well said - if you're that worried about weight, you won't enjoy the ride as much! (constantly grumbling about the extra gram of toast you had that morning)
    Hardtails aren't called hardcore for no reason

    Giant STP: http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1996804/
    Spesh Hardrock: http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1996822/
  • The Spiderman
    The Spiderman Posts: 5,625
    I have found this too.With bikes its all the little incidental,seemingly insignificant bits,when added together,which add to more than you think.
    Individually little bits like rim strips,cables,top cap,water bottle, cage and bolts,headset spacers,seat clamp,qr skewers,etc,don`t sound like much but often add up to 500g or so.
    XC racers use ti bolts ,because all those seemingly insignificant 8g bolts add up when multiplied several times.Its quite normal to be able to save 300g or more,on bolts alone.
    For real as opposed to quoted weights,have a look on www.weightweenies.com
    I used to obsess about these things,but soon came to realise that I was always going to be lighter and faster on my hardtail than my 17 stone mate on his 6" travel full susser. :lol:
    2006 Giant XTC
    2010 Giant Defy Advanced
    2016 Boardman Pro 29er
    2016 Pinnacle Lithium 4
    2017 Canondale Supersix Evo
  • nvc
    nvc Posts: 31
    well said - if you're that worried about weight, you won't enjoy the ride as much! (constantly grumbling about the extra gram of toast you had that morning)

    then you miss a different kind of fun. :lol:
  • FSR_XC
    FSR_XC Posts: 2,258
    What about oils & grease etc.

    There is going to be a bit of difference between 'dry' weight & 'ride ready' weight.

    Are you including all of the bolts?
    Stumpjumper FSR 09/10 Pro Carbon, Genesis Vapour CX20 ('17)Carbon, Rose Xeon CW3000 '14, Raleigh R50

    http://www.visiontrack.com
  • grantway
    grantway Posts: 1,430
    Same has race bikes normaly the Manufacture will wheigh the small bike
    and submit that as the weight of the bike.

    Unless if the bike is reviewed and frame size is stated in a test bike
    in a magazine

    But in saying that when I rang Orange they told me the exact wheight
    of the bikes I was intrested in, and this was a medium to large size frames.