Is SRAM any good?
passout
Posts: 4,425
Buying a new bike with SRAM 7 bits on it - shifters & deraillers. Have the chance to upgrade to XT at a cost. Anyway, I want to know the difference. Does XT perform much better?
I've always had Shimano and know nothing of SRAM.
I've always had Shimano and know nothing of SRAM.
'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.
0
Comments
-
leave the Sram on."Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
Parktools :?:SheldonBrown0 -
Personally I would leave the SRAM on. Its personal preference really (I think the shifting is more reliable with SRAM) but I doubt you will notice any real benefits of putting the XT on.
To see a real improvement in shifting performance, for not that much cash, get some high quality gear cables. I would personally recommend the Shimano XTR cable set which is of course compatible with either SRAM or Shimano shifters and derailleurs.
Stu0 -
xt is far superiorBianchi Via Nirone 7 Alu/Carbon, 2011
Specialized Stumpjumper, 07
Genisis Altitude 30, 09
Giant XTC4, 040 -
In what way would you say that XT is far superior?
Stu0 -
leave SRAM on0
-
Personal preference. XT is only a little more expensive than X7. I find Shimano to be better made, and quicker and slicker shifting. SRAM is more 'positive' with a definite thunk. XT shifters now dual release too. SRAM has a different cable pull which helps in muddy conditions.0
-
What dirtbiker said I changed from xt to sram and wont be goin back to shimano anytime soon :P"If i was a slug i don't think i could handle it, i'd just throw myself in the salt pot" -Karl pilkington
Whyte 46, i fall off it alot!!0 -
As 'sonic says, not much difference between the 2. Shimano IS a little bit slicker, but dont know about better made. Sram is good stuff and with the different pull ratio works better when things get muddy. More of a click into gear than shimano's snick.... but more reliable in my experience. Saying that, I find shimano's front mechs better....0
-
To be honest, I don't think there is that much difference in the performance.
Both work very well. The biggest thing is the way they shift. Shimano using thumb & finger, whereas with the SRAM you thumb both levers. Neither are that difficult to get used to. I have switched between the 2 systems a few times when borrowing a bike.
My preference is XT, but even then, my shifters are the cheaper Deore. Not that it makes too much difference, but I think X-7 is equivalent to LX (X-9 = XT)
Personally, if the bike comes with SRAM, I can't see any real point in changing.Stumpjumper FSR 09/10 Pro Carbon, Genesis Vapour CX20 ('17)Carbon, Rose Xeon CW3000 '14, Raleigh R50
http://www.visiontrack.com0 -
ratty2k wrote:Saying that, I find shimano's front mechs better....0
-
Some good replies so far, thanks.'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.0
-
Have one XT/LX Stumpjumper and one SRAM X-9/X-7 Stumpjumper.
I prefer the SRAM stuff - looked at both very closely (cos I'm sad) and the SRAM machining and finishing just looks better, it seems to need almost zero maintenance and it seems to shift a bit more positively.0 -
dirtbiker100 wrote:ratty2k wrote:Saying that, I find shimano's front mechs better....
The GT i'm buying is the same.
X-9 rear, LX front.
Passout have you tried the bike or sram system. Some prefer it some don't, its definately a bit more clunky than XT, but on the same note its a more definate gear change.
Its horses for courses really. I don't think anyone should or would recommend that you change to shimano before giving SRAM a try, it would be a waste of money as SRAM is good in its own right, its just different.
Someone may change it themselves, but thats because there are some people who only like Shimano gears, on that same note there are some that love SRAM.0 -
The bike shop probably has a bike with X7 and another with XT in stock, take both for a spin round the car park and see which you like the feel of.
I'd probably stick with Sram myself, but I was under the impression that X7 was on par with LX rather than XT - and I can't comment on the relative durability of the two ranges.0 -
Chaka - it is.
X-5 = Deore
X-7 = LX
X-9 = XT
X-0 = XTR
(more or less).0 -
Surf-Matt wrote:Chaka - it is.
X-5 = Deore
X-7 = LX
X-9 = XT
X-0 = XTR
(more or less).
What I said too!Stumpjumper FSR 09/10 Pro Carbon, Genesis Vapour CX20 ('17)Carbon, Rose Xeon CW3000 '14, Raleigh R50
http://www.visiontrack.com0 -
I did ride their test bike - which was XT. I've never ridden SRAM - perhaps I should have a go as suggested.
Are they the same in terms of longevity? It's hard to tell but I'm sure some of you may have some comments.'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.0 -
I have SRAM X7 on my pitch and it's never complained once in 8 months which is awesome considering most of my riding is done around delamere forest which is mainly sand.
Silica makes awesome grinding paste0 -
Personally from a purely aesthetic point of view I much prefer the look of the SRAM shifters to the shimano equivalent.
I think if you are switching from shimano to SRAM there will obviously be a difference that will take a little getting used to, in the fact that SRAM is all thumb.
Not sure if anyone will complain about the robustness of either systems though.0 -
I've used both systems and never really had any problems with either . I agree with GibboGT on the looks sram is nicer looking . A lot of reliability comes down to cleanliness of cables more than anything else.0
-
Sram much better every bike I had has had Sram would not want
anything else really0