Hey all. Im looking for a new set up on my tyres now as my Tioga DH Factory 2.3 are badly worn. I will be doing a bit of everything but i need lots of grip as i do freeriding. Any ideas?
Go for a 42a Compound on the front and 60a on the rear.
Single Ply's are a lot lighter than dual ply's. As long as you use decent tubes with the single ply's and don't plough through rock gardens you will be fine.
Glad someone likes Conti Verticals!! I thought they were the worst tyres I've used so far..... no grip at all when things got damp. I like the Kenda Bluegroove/ Nevegal combo myself.
Have to agree with the HighRoller 42a/60a 2.35 combo but if you prefer a more fully treaded tyre, Michelin Mountain Xtrem 2.2s are also very good
They are more like a Maxxis minion/ Michelin Comp 24. The lateral grip and mud shedding is no where near as good as the high rollers.
I agreed with the High Roller suggestion as you can see but the OP didn't like the look of high rollers so I offered an alternative that maybe doesn't shed mud as well but certainly grips as well in corners in all but the wettest conditions and is first rate on rocky sections, hardpack and north-shore. I trust when you say "no where near as good" you've ridden them and aren't just offering theory based advice.
"Internet Forums - an amazing world where outright falsehoods become cyber-facts with a few witty key taps and a carefully placed emoticon."
Conti Verticals 2.3s do grip in the mud if you have the right pressure in them.
A Panaracer Trailraker is a good option as a rear tyre for more grip though.
Tioga DH tyres are like bambi on iceskates on stretches of wet tarmac and so are Spesh Enduros, I've still got the gravel rash to prove it.
I'm running a kenda nevegal on the front and a nobby nic on the back - i think this might be the wrong way round though, what do you think?! The reason it's on this way is cos a bike shop lost my old front tyre and bunged on a nobby nic instead. haven't got round to changing it over yet.
I'm running a kenda nevegal on the front and a nobby nic on the back - i think this might be the wrong way round though, what do you think?! The reason it's on this way is cos a bike shop lost my old front tyre and bunged on a nobby nic instead. haven't got round to changing it over yet.
They're both reasonably good all rounders so I'm not sure which way they would be better. Are they both the same size?
"Internet Forums - an amazing world where outright falsehoods become cyber-facts with a few witty key taps and a carefully placed emoticon."
yeah, both 2.1s. But I feel like I'm getting a shed load of grip off the nic, even though it looks like a really fast rolling tyre. I might swap em over and see what happens and how it feels.
Probably the best way to find out. The rear will tend to grip better than the front, and a just scrubbed-in tyre will feel better than a partially worn one so who knows.
"Internet Forums - an amazing world where outright falsehoods become cyber-facts with a few witty key taps and a carefully placed emoticon."
I've got Specs eskars on my pitch (OE Fitment) and even though I don;t exactly know loads about tyres they grip very well in mud, sandy stuff and over roots.
Posts
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1694806/
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1993863/
Go for a 42a Compound on the front and 60a on the rear.
Single Ply's are a lot lighter than dual ply's. As long as you use decent tubes with the single ply's and don't plough through rock gardens you will be fine.
Inbred
Whats the difference. But also they dont look very grippy
I use halo
Kona Scrap
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1694806/
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1993863/
and im running them on Halo Combats with Halo innertubes
Kona Scrap
Nobby Nicks front and Racing Ralph spring & Autumn
Racing Ralph front and back summer
Assuming we get a normal season
42a is a softer compound so more grip but less durable.
They are plenty grippy enough, one of the most widely used downhill tyres.
They are more like a Maxxis minion/ Michelin Comp 24. The lateral grip and mud shedding is no where near as good as the high rollers.
Inbred
http://www.conti-tyres.co.uk/conticycle ... ical.shtml
Whadda ya mean I dont believe in god?
I talk to him everyday....
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1694806/
http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1993863/
I agreed with the High Roller suggestion as you can see but the OP didn't like the look of high rollers so I offered an alternative that maybe doesn't shed mud as well but certainly grips as well in corners in all but the wettest conditions and is first rate on rocky sections, hardpack and north-shore. I trust when you say "no where near as good" you've ridden them and aren't just offering theory based advice.
http://chainreactioncycles.com/Models.a ... elID=18479
A Panaracer Trailraker is a good option as a rear tyre for more grip though.
Tioga DH tyres are like bambi on iceskates on stretches of wet tarmac and so are Spesh Enduros, I've still got the gravel rash to prove it.
They're both reasonably good all rounders so I'm not sure which way they would be better. Are they both the same size?